Implementation of the Care Plan
NOTE: If a component is absent, student receives a zero for that component.
Rubric
Unsatisfactory 1 | Emerging 2 | Proficient 3 | Exemplary 4 | Score | |
Assignment Components | |||||
Described the small group and provided a rationale for the selection. | No group selected. | Selected a group but no rationale provided for the selection. | Selected a small group and provided vague rationale for the selection. | Selected an appropriate, small group and provided rationale for the selection. | [Score x 3 = 12 pts] |
Identified the section of the plan that will be implemented in the small group. | No selection of the plan identified for implementation. | Identified the section of the plan that will be implemented in the small group. Included no rationale for the selection. | Identified the section of the plan that is appropriate for implementation in the small group. Included vague rationale for the selection. | Identified the section of the plan that is appropriate for implementation in the small group. Included clear and appropriate rationale for the selection. | [Score x 2 = 8 pts] |
Described the health risk that can be tackled by implementing the selected intervention. | No description included. | Unclear description included. | Clear description included. | Clear description included along with appropriate rationale. | [Score x 2 = 8 pts] |
Described expected results. | No description included. | Unclear description included. | Clear description included. | Clear description included along with appropriate rationale. | [Score x 2 = 8 pts] |
Described how the intervention might be implemented in practice, including specific strategies, and listing resources needed. | No description included. | Unclear description included. | Clear description included and listed resources needed. | Clear description included along with specific strategies, and listed resources needed. | [Score x 2 = 8 pts] |
Estimated the time needed for results to be seen. | No estimate provided. | Provided an estimate but with no rationale. | Provided an estimate but with vague rationale. | Provided an estimate but with clear rationale. | [Score x 2 = 8 pts] |
Participated in proposed implementation discussion. | Did not participate in implementation discussion. | Participated in implementation discussion with very little input. | Participated in implementation discussion. | Participated in the implementation discussion with a clear proposal. | [Score x 2 = 8 pts] |
Written Components | |||||
Organization Introduction Thesis Transitions Conclusion | Introduction is limited or missing entirely. The paper lacks a thesis statement. Transitions are infrequent, illogical, or missing entirely. Conclusion is limited or missing entirely. | Introduction is present but incomplete or underdeveloped. The paper is loosely organized around a thesis that may have to be inferred. Transitions are sporadic. Conclusion is present, but incomplete or underdeveloped. | Introduction has a clear opening, provides background information, and states the topic. The paper is organized around an arguable, clearly stated thesis statement. Transitions are appropriate and help the flow of ideas. Conclusion summarizes main argument and has a clear ending. | Introduction catches the reader’s attention, provides compelling and appropriate background info, and clearly states the topic. The paper is well organized around an arguable, focused thesis. Thoughtful transitions clearly show how ideas relate. Conclusion leaves the reader with a sense of closure and provides concluding insights. | [Score x 2 = 8 pts] |
Usage and Mechanics Grammar Spelling Sentence structure | Writing contains numerous errors in spelling, grammar, and/or sentence structure that severely interferes with readability and comprehension. | Errors in spelling and grammar exist that somewhat interfere with readability and/or comprehension. | Writing follows conventions of spelling and grammar throughout. Errors are infrequent and do not interfere with readability or comprehension. | The paper is basically error free in terms of mechanics. Grammar and mechanics help establish a clear idea and aid the reader in following the writer’s logic. | [Score x 2 = 8 pts] |
APA Elements Attribution Paraphrasing | No attempt at APA format. | APA format is attempted to paraphrase, quote, | Using APA format, accurately paraphrased, quoted, | Using APA format, accurately paraphrased, quoted, | [Score x 1 = 4 pts] |
Quotations | and cite, but errors are significant. | and cited in many spots throughout when appropriate or called for. Errors present are somewhat minor. | and cited throughout the presentation when appropriate or called for. Only a few minor errors present. | ||
Subtotal | |||||
Timeliness | Late Work Penalty: | ||||
Total Score | / 80 |
Page 1 of 3
NSG4075 Capstone
© 2013 South University