Does anyone know about Criminology

The student will research the riots of Ferguson Missouri through articles, news reports etc. The student will then compare and contrast the criminal actions of the "Protesters" using the multiple theories of Criminology, part 2 in the text. The text is to be used as the bases for the comparisons. The question of "why" must be answered using the theories. The student needs to be specific in their conclusions. This paper will be written in APA style. ​ The paper will be a minimum of five pages exclusive of cover page, abstract and reference pages. Writing Assignment Rubric (WAR) Criteria Ratings Pts This c rit e rio n is lin ke d to a Learn in g Outc o m eR ESPO N SIV EN ESS ( D id th e s tu dent re sp ond adequate ly to th e writ in g assig nm ent? ) Exe m pla ry - Resp onds t o assig ned o r se le cte d to pic ; Goes b eyo nd what is re quir e d in so m e meanin gfu l way ( e .g ., id eas co ntr ib ute a new d im ensio n to w hat w e kn ow a bo ut th e to pic , unearth s so m eth in g unantic ip ate d); Is s u bsta ntiv e and evid ence -b ase d; Dem onstr a te s th at th e stu dent h as re ad, v ie w ed, and co nsid ere d th e Learn in g Reso urc e s in th e c o urs e a nd th at th e assig nm ent Acco m plis hed - Resp onds to th e assig ned or se le cte d to pic ; Is su bsta ntiv e a nd evid ence - base d; Dem onstr ate s th at th e stu dent has r e ad, vie w ed, and co nsid ere d th e Learn in g Reso urc e s in th e co urs e and th at th e assig nm e nt answ er/p a per to pic co nnects in a meanin gfu Deve lo pin g - S om ew hat mis se s th e poin t o f th e assig ned o r se le cte d to pic ; and/o r Lacks in su bsta nce , re ly in g more o n anecd ota l th an evid ence ; and/o r Conta in s lit tle evid ence th at t h e stu dent h as re ad, vie w ed, a nd co nsid ere d th e Learn in g Reso urc e s in t h e co urs e a nd th at t h e assig nm ent answ er/p ap er to pic co nnects in Begin nin g - Mis se s th e poin t o f th e assig ned or s e le cte d to pic ; and/o r Relie s prim arily on anecd ota l evid ence ; and/o r Conta in s lit tle evid ence th at t h e stu dent has r e ad, vie w ed, and co nsid ere d th e Learn in g Reso urc e s in t h e co urs e a nd th at t h e assig nm ent answ er/p a per to pic co nnects in a meanin gfu l No Cre dit - ( 0 poin ts ) No assig n ment co m pl ete d o r no cre dit earn ed . 0.0 p ts 34.0 pts answ er/p aper to pic c o nnects in a meanin gfu l way to th e co urs e co nte nt; a nd Is su bm it te d b y th e d ue d ate . 34.0 p ts l w ay to th e c o urs e co nte nt; and Is su bm it te d by th e d ue date . 27.0 p ts a meanin gfu l way t o th e co urs e co nte nt; and/o r Is su bm it te d by th e d ue date . 24.0 p ts way t o th e co urs e co nte nt; and/o r Is su bm it te d past th e la te deadlin e. 20.0 p ts This c rit e rio n is lin ke d to a Learn in g Outc o m eC O NTE N T K N O W LE D G E (D oes th e c o nte nt dem onstr a te a n unders ta ndin g o f th e im porta nt kn ow le dge th e assig nm ent is in te nded to dem onstr a te ?) Exe m pla ry - In -d epth unders ta ndi ng a nd applic a tio n of c o nce pts and is su e s pre se nte d in th e c o urs e (e .g ., in sig htfu l in te rp re ta tio ns o r analy se s; accu ra te and perc e ptiv e para lle ls , id eas, opin io ns, and co nclu sio ns) , s h ow in g th at th e stu dent h as abso rb ed th e g enera l prin cip le s and id ea s pre se nte d and m ake s in fe re nce s about th e co nce pts /is s ues o r Acco m plis h ed - Unders ta ndin g and applic a tio n o f th e co nce p ts a nd is su es pre se nt ed in th e co urs e , dem on str a tin g th at t h e stu dent has abso rb ed th e genera l prin cip l es a nd id eas pre se nt ed; Rele va nt exa m pl es; Though t- p ro vo Deve lo p in g - Min im al unders t andin g of co nce pt s a nd is su es pre se nt ed in th e co urs e , and, while genera ll y accu ra t e, dis p la ys so m e om is sio ns and/o r err o rs ; and/o r Few and/o r ir re le va nt exa m ple s; and/o r Few if any Begin ni ng - A la ck o f unders t andin g of th e co nce p ts a nd is su es pre se nt ed in th e co urs e and/o r applic a tio n is in accu r ate a nd co nta in s m any om is si ons and/o r err o rs ; and/o r No exa m pl es o r ir re le va nt exa m pl es; and/o r No th ought No Cre d it - No assi gnm ent co m ple te d o r no cre di t earn ed. 0.0 pts 33.0 pts co nnects to th em to oth er id e as; Ric h a n d re le va n t exa m ple s; Thought- p ro vo kin g id eas and in te rp re ta tio ns, o rig in al th in kin g , new pers p ectiv e s; O rig in al and c rit ic a l th in kin g ; and; Maste ry a nd th oughtfu l/ a ccu ra te applic a tio n of kn ow le dge and s kil ls o r str a te gie s pre se nte d in th e c o urs e . 33.0 p ts kin g id eas and in te rp re ta tio ns, so m e orig in al th in kin g; Crit ic a l th in kin g; a nd Maste r y a nd applic a tio n o f kn ow le dge and skills o r str a te gi es pre se nt ed in th e co urs e . 26.0 pts th ought- pro vo kin g id eas, lit tle orig in al th in kin g; and/o r “R egurg it a te d” kn ow le d ge ra th er th an crit ic a l th in kin g; and/o r Lit t le maste ry of s kills and/o r num ero us err o rs when usin g th e kn ow le d ge, skills , o r str a te gi es pre se nt ed in th e co urs e . 23.0 p ts -p ro vo k in g id eas or orig in al th in kin g; and/o r No crit ic a l th in kin g; and/o r Many crit ic a l err o rs when apply in g kn ow le dge, skills , or str a te gi es pre se nt ed in th e co urs e . 20.0 pts This c rit e rio n is lin ke d to a Learn in g Outc o m eQ UALIT Y O F W RIT IN G Exe m pla ry - Use s la ngu age th at is cle ar, co ncis e, a nd appro pria te ; Has fe w if any erro rs in sp ellin g, gra m mar, and syn ta x ; Is extr e mely well org ani ze d, lo gic a l , a nd cle ar and neve r co nfu s es th e re ader ; U se s a pre po ndera nce o f orig in al la ngu age and use s dir e ct quote s o nly Acc om pl is h e d - Use s la ng uag e th at is cle ar ; Has a fe w err o r s in sp ell in g, gra mm ar, and syn t ax; Is well org a niz e d, lo gic al, and cle ar ; Use s orig i nal la ng uag e and use s dir e c t quot es whe Deve lo pin g - Use s la ngua ge th at is uncle ar and/o r in appro pria te ; and/o r Has more th an occa si onal err o rs in sp ellin g, gra m m ar, a nd syn ta x; and/o r Is poorly org aniz ed, is at tim es uncle ar and co nfu si ng, a nd has so m e pro ble ms wit h lo gic a l flo w ; and/o r Refle ct s a n underu se o f orig in al la ngua ge a nd an Begin nin g - Use s uncle a r a nd in appr opria te la ngua ge; and/o r Has many err o rs in sp ellin g, gra m mar, and syn ta x ; and/o r Lacks org ani za tio n in a way th at cre ate s co nfu s io n f o r th e re ader ; and/o r Conta i ns many dir e ct quote s fr o m orig in a l so urc e mate ri als and/o r co nsis te ntly No Cr edi t - No as sig nm ent co mp le t ed or no cre dit ear ne d. 0.0 pts 33.0 pts when nece s sa ry and/o r appro pria te ; and Pro vid es in fo rm atio n about a so urc e when cit in g or para p hra sin g it . 33.0 pts n nece ssa r y and/ or appr opri ate ; and Pro v id es in fo r mati on abo ut a so ur ce whe n cit in g o r para phra sin g it . 26.0 pts ove ru s e o f dir e ct quote s and para ph ra se s; and/o r Som eti mes la cks in fo rm a tio n about a so urc e when cit in g or para ph ra sin g it . 23.0 pts and poorly para p hra se s ra th er th an usin g orig in a l la ngua ge; and/o r Lacks in fo rm atio n about a so urc e when cit in g or para p hra sin g it . 20.0 pts Total Points: 100.0