Evaluate Team Member Effectiveness
1 . Aw ard: 10 out of 10.00 points Score: 10 /10 Points 10 0 % S e lfA sse ssm e n t 8 .3 : E v a lu a te (Y o u r ) T e a m M e m b e r E ffe c tiv e n e ss To assess your own team m em ber effectiveness, com plete the assessm ent answering each item in term s of the extent you agree that you do each. Calculate your overall team effectiveness score and com pare it to the norm s listed below to gauge your general team m em ber effectiveness. Next, calculate the subtotal for each com petency and com pare your subtotals to the arbitrary norm s listed below to assess your effectiveness on each com petency. Then, to determ ine which com petencies are the strongest and weakest for you, calculate your average for each and com pare them . The averages are com puted by taking the subtotal for each and dividing it by the num ber of item s for that com petency. This will show you the relative strength of your team com petencies. Im prove the value of this m easure further still by evaluating yourself in term s of your effectiveness in a particular team (school, work, or other organization). Then, have a m em ber of that sam e team evaluate you. Com pare your scores with those given by your team m ate, identify the consistent scores and those that differ, and use this feedback to im prove your own team m em ber effectiveness. Strongly Disagree Disagree Som ewhat Agree Agree Strongly Agree N/A Not Applicable... * 1. Did a fair share of the team 's work. * 2. Fulfilled responsibilities to the team . * 3. Com pleted work in a tim ely m anner. * 4. Cam e to team m eetings prepared. * 5. Did work that was com plete and accurate. * 6. Com m unicated effectively. * 7. Exchanged inform ation with team m ates in a tim ely m anner. * 8. Provided encouragem ent to other team m em bers. * 9. Accepted feedback about strengths and weaknesses from team m ates. * 10. Used team m ates' feedback to im prove perform ance. * 11. Let other team m em bers help when it was necessary. * 12. Stayed aware of fellow team m em bers' progress. * 13. Assessed whether the team was m aking progress as expected. * 14. Provided constructive feedback to others on the team . * 15. M ade sure that everyone on the team understood im portant4/18/2017 Assignment Print View http://ezto.mheducation.com/hm.tpx?todo=printviewSingle 1/5 Contributing to the Team ’s W ork 0 10 pts. Feedback: Low contribution Interacting with Team m ates 0 12 pts. Feedback: Low level of interaction K eeping the Team on Track 0 10 pts. Feedback: Not very skilled at keeping on track Expecting Q uality 0 6 pts. Feedback: Low quality expectations H aving Relevant K nowledge, Skills, and Abilities (K SAs) 5 7 pts. Feedback: M oderately relevant knowledge and skills 0 42 pts. Feedback: Less effective team m em ber Source: Adapted from M . W . Ohland, M . L. Loughry, D. J. W oehr, L. G. Bullard, R. M . Felder, C. J. Finelli, R. A. Layton, H. R. Pomeranz, and D. G. Schmucker, “The Comprehensive Assessment of Team M ember Effectiveness: Development of a Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scale for Self and Peer Evaluation,” Academy of Management Learning & Education, 2012, pp. 609–630. Score : 7 pts. Score : 9 pts. Score : 8 pts. Score : 5 pts. Score : 5 pts. Feedback score: Score : 34 pts. Rangebased Feedback: * 15. M ade sure that everyone on the team understood im portant inform ation. * 16. Helped the team to plan and organize its work. * 17. Expected the team to succeed. * 18. Believed that the team should achieve high standards. * 19. Cared that the team produced highquality work. * 20. Had the skills and abilities that were necessary to do a good job. * 21. Had enough knowledge of team m ates’ jobs to be able to fill in if necessary. rev: 03_16_2016_Q C_CS44758 S e lfA sse ssm e n t 8 .3 : E v a lu a te (Y o u r ) T e a m M e m b e r E ffe c tiv e n e ss To assess your own team m em ber effectiveness, com plete the assessm ent answering each item in term s of the extent you agree that you do each. Calculate your overall team effectiveness score and com pare it to the norm s listed below to gauge your general team m em ber effectiveness. Next, calculate the subtotal for each com petency and com pare your subtotals to the arbitrary norm s listed below to assess your effectiveness on each com petency. Then, to determ ine which com petencies are the strongest and weakest for you, calculate your average for each and com pare them . The averages are com puted by taking the subtotal for each and dividing it by the num ber of item s for that com petency. This will show you the relative strength of your team com petencies. Im prove the value of this m easure further still by evaluating yourself in term s of your effectiveness in a particular team (school, work, or other organization). Then, have a m em ber of that sam e team evaluate you. Com pare your scores with those given by your team m ate, identify the consistent scores and those that differ, and use this feedback to im prove your own team m em ber effectiveness. Strongly Disagree | 1 pts. Disagree | 2 pts. Som ewhat Agree | 3 pts. Agree | 4 pts. Strongly Agree | 5 pts.4/18/2017 Assignment Print View http://ezto.mheducation.com/hm.tpx?todo=printviewSingle 2/5 Contributing to the Team ’s W ork Interacting with Team m ates K eeping the Team on Track This question accepts all answers. Strongly Disagree | 1 pts. Disagree | 2 pts. Som ewhat Agree | 3 pts. Agree | 4 pts. Strongly Agree | 5 pts. N/A Not Applicable... | 0 pts. * 1. Did a fair share of the team 's work. (1wt.) * 2. Fulfilled responsibilities to the team . (1wt.) * 3. Com pleted work in a tim ely m anner. (1wt.) * 4. Cam e to team m eetings prepared. (1wt.) * 5. Did work that was com plete and accurate. (1wt.) Strongly Disagree | 1 pts. Disagree | 2 pts. Som ewhat Agree | 3 pts. Agree | 4 pts. Strongly Agree | 5 pts. N/A Not Applicable... | 0 pts. * 6. Com m unicated effectively. (1wt.) * 7. Exchanged inform ation with team m ates in a tim ely m anner. (1wt.) * 8. Provided encouragem ent to other team m em bers. (1wt.) * 9. Accepted feedback about strengths and weaknesses from team m ates. (1wt.) * 10. Used team m ates' feedback to im prove perform ance. (1wt.) * 11. Let other team m em bers help when it was necessary. (1wt.) Strongly Disagree | 1 pts. Disagree | 2 pts. Som ewhat Agree | 3 pts. Agree | 4 pts. Strongly Agree | 5 pts. N/A Not Applicable... | 0 pts. * 12. Stayed aware of fellow team m em bers' progress. (1wt.) * 13. Assessed whether the team was m aking progress as expected. (1wt.) * 14. Provided constructive feedback to others on the team . (1wt.) * 15. M ade sure that everyone on the team understood im portant inform ation. (1wt.) Strongly Disagree | 1 pts. Disagree | 2 pts. Som ewhat Agree | 3 pts. Agree | 4 pts. Strongly Agree | 5 pts. N/A Not Applicable... | 0 pts.4/18/2017 Assignment Print View http://ezto.mheducation.com/hm.tpx?todo=printviewSingle 3/5 Expecting Q uality H aving Relevant K nowledge, Skills, and Abilities (K SAs) Feedback: Contributing to the Team ’s W ork 20 25 pts. 11 19 pts. 0 10 pts. Interacting with Team m ates 24 30 pts. 13 23 pts. 0 12 pts. K eeping the Team on Track 20 25 pts. 11 19 pts. 0 10 pts. Strongly Disagree | 1 pts. Disagree | 2 pts. Som ewhat Agree Agree | 4 pts. Strongly Agree N/A Not Applicable... * 16. Helped the team to plan and organize its work. (1wt.) Strongly Disagree | 1 pts. Disagree | 2 pts. Som ewhat Agree | 3 pts. Agree | 4 pts. Strongly Agree | 5 pts. N/A Not Applicable... | 0 pts. * 17. Expected the team to succeed. (1wt.) * 18. Believed that the team should achieve high standards. (1wt.) * 19. Cared that the team produced highquality work. (1wt.) Strongly Disagree | 1 pts. Disagree | 2 pts. Som ewhat Agree | 3 pts. Agree | 4 pts. Strongly Agree | 5 pts. N/A Not Applicable... | 0 pts. * 20. Had the skills and abilities that were necessary to do a good job. (1wt.) * 21. Had enough knowledge of team m ates’ jobs to be able to fill in if necessary. (1wt.) FEEDBACK : High contribution FEEDBACK : M oderate contribution FEEDBACK : Low contribution FEEDBACK : High level of interaction FEEDBACK : M oderate level of interaction FEEDBACK : Low level of interaction FEEDBACK : Highly skilled at keeping on track FEEDBACK : M oderately skilled at keeping on track FEEDBACK : Not very skilled at keeping on track4/18/2017 Assignment Print View http://ezto.mheducation.com/hm.tpx?todo=printviewSingle 4/5 Expecting Q uality 12 15 pts. 7 11 pts. 0 6 pts. H aving Relevant K nowledge, Skills, and Abilities (K SAs) 8 10 pts. 5 7 pts. 0 4 pts. Rangebased feedback: 0 42 pts. 43 83 pts. 84 105 pts. Source: Adapted from M . W . Ohland, M . L. Loughry, D. J. W oehr, L. G. Bullard, R. M . Felder, C. J. Finelli, R. A. Layton, H. R. Pomeranz, and D. G. Schmucker, “The Comprehensive Assessment of Team M ember Effectiveness: Development of a Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scale for Self and Peer Evaluation,” Academy of Management Learning & Education, 2012, pp. 609–630.
FEEDBACK : High quality expectations FEEDBACK : M oderate quality expectations FEEDBACK : Low quality expectations FEEDBACK : Highly relevant knowledge and skills FEEDBACK : M oderately relevant knowledge and skills FEEDBACK : Not particularly relevant know ledge and skills FEEDBACK : Less effective team m em ber FEEDBACK : M oderately effective team m em ber FEEDBACK : Highly effective team m em ber rev: 03_16_2016_Q C_CS44758 4/18/2017 Assignment Print View http://ezto.mheducation.com/hm.tpx?todo=printviewSingle 5/5
