"dr keloki reborn only' '
THE RISE OF ECUADOR’S ROSE INDUSTRY
Opening Case
It is 6:20 a.m. on February 7 in the Ecuadorean town of Cayambe, and Maria Pacheco has just been
dropped off for work by the company bus. She pulls on thick rubber gloves, wraps an apron over her
dress, and grabs her clippers, ready for another long day. Any other time of year, Maria would work until
2 p.m., but it’s a week before Valentine’s Day, and Maria, along with her coworkers at the farm, are likely
to be busy until 5 p.m. By then, Maria will have cut more than 1,000 rose stems. A few days later, after
they have been refrigerated and shipped via aircraft, the roses Maria cut will be selling for premium
prices in stores from New York to London.
Ecuadorean roses are acknowledged to be the best in the world. They have huge heads and unusually
vibrant colors, including 10 different reds, from bleeding-heart crimson to a rosy lover’s blush. Of the 200
million roses produced for American consumers on Valentine’s Day, about 80 percent comes from
Ecuador or neighboring Colombia. The rest are mostly grown in California. It used to be the case that
IB-Ch_01.indd 2 3/24/2014 3:29:47 PM
G l o b a l i z a t i o n 3
many more were grown in the United States in places like New Jersey, once known as the nation’s rose
capital, but a combination of high costs, lower trade barriers, and rapid intercontinental transportation led
to the migration of production to countries like Ecuador. The last commercial rose grower in New Jersey
shut down in 1999.
Most of Ecuador’s 400 or so rose farms are located in the Cayambe and Cotopaxi regions, 10,000 feet
up in the Andes about an hour’s drive from the capital, Quito. The rose bushes are planted in huge flat
fields at the foot of snowcapped volcanoes that rise to more than 20,000 feet. The bushes are protected
by 20-foot-high canopies of plastic sheeting. The combination of intense sunlight, fertile volcanic soil, an
equatorial location, and high altitude makes for ideal growing conditions, allowing roses to flower almost
year-round, giving Ecuador a comparative advantage in the production of roses.
Ecuador’s rose industry started some 30 years ago and was spurred on in the early 1990s when the U.S.
government reduced tariffs on some South American imports, including flowers, to steer the countries
away from cocaine production. Ecuador is now the world’s second-largest producer of roses, and roses
are the nation’s third-largest export. Rose farms support over 100,000 jobs in the country. The revenues
and taxes from rose growers have helped to pave roads, build schools, and construct sophisticated
irrigation systems.
Maria works Monday to Saturday and earns $400 a month, substantially above the country’s
$240-a-month minimum wage. The farm also provides her with health care and a pension. By employing
women such as Maria, the industry has fostered a social revolution in which mothers and wives have
more control over their family’s spending, especially on schooling for their children.
For all of the benefits that roses have bought to Ecuador, the industry has come under fire from
environmentalists. Large growers have been accused of misusing a toxic mixture of pesticides, fungicides,
and fumigants to grow and export unblemished, pest-free flowers. Reports claim that workers often
fumigate roses in street clothes without protective equipment. Some doctors and scientists claim that
many of the industry’s employees have serious health problems as a result of exposure to toxic chemicals.
A study by the International Labor Organization claimed that women in the industry had more miscarriages
than average and that some 60 percent of all workers suffered from headaches, nausea, blurred vision,
and fatigue. Still, the critics acknowledge that their studies have been hindered by a lack of access to the
farms, and they do not know what the true situation is.
In response, some Ecuadorean growers have joined a voluntary program aimed at helping customers
identify responsible growers. Fair-trade certification signifies that the grower has distributed protective
gear, trained workers in using chemicals, and hired doctors to visit workers at least weekly. Other
environmental groups have pushed for stronger sanctions, including trade sanctions, against Ecuadorean
rose growers that are not environmentally certified by a reputable agency. On February 14, however,
most consumers are oblivious to these issues; they simply want to show their appreciation to their
significant others with a perfect bunch of roses.1
INTRODUCTION
Over the past three decades a fundamental shift has been occurring in the world economy. We have been
moving away from a world in which national economies were relatively self-contained entities, isolated
from each other by barriers to cross-border trade and investment; by distance, time zones, and language;
and by national differences in government regulation, culture, and business systems. We are moving
toward a world in which barriers to cross-border trade and investment are declining; perceived distance
is shrinking due to advances in transportation and telecommunications technology; material culture is
IB-Ch_01.indd 3 3/24/2014 3:29:47 PM
4 I n t e r n a t i o n a l B u s i n e s s
starting to look similar the world over; and national economies are merging into an interdependent,
integrated global economic system. The process by which this transformation is occurring is commonly
referred to as globalization.
The rise of the Ecuadorian rose-growing industry, profiled in the opening case, is but one small
example of the trend toward globalization. Thirty years ago the roses purchased by a New Yorker on
Valentine’s Day were probably grown in neighboring New Jersey. Now they are grown on another
continent and cut, packed, and shipped to New York within 24 hours of being purchased. The same New
Yorker might drive to work in a car that was designed in Germany and assembled in Mexico by Ford
from components made in the United States and Japan, which were fabricated from Korean steel and
Malaysian rubber. He may have filled the car with gasoline at a Shell service station owned by a British-
Dutch multinational company. The gasoline could have been made from oil pumped out of a well off the
coast of Africa by a French oil company that transported it to the United States in a ship owned by a
Greek shipping line. While driving to work, the American might talk to his stockbroker (using a handsfree
in-car speaker) on an Apple iPhone that was designed in California and assembled in China using
chip sets produced in Japan and Europe, glass made by Corning in Kentucky, and memory chips from
South Korea. He could tell the stockbroker to purchase shares in Lenovo, a multinational Chinese PC
manufacturer whose operational headquarters is in North Carolina.
This is the world in which we live. It is a world where the volume of goods, services, and investments
crossing national borders has expanded faster than world output for more than half a century. It is a
world where more than $4 trillion in foreign exchange transactions are made every day, where $18.3
trillion of goods and $4.3 trillion of services were sold across national borders in 2012.2 It is a world in
which international institutions such as the World Trade Organization and gatherings of leaders from the
world’s most powerful economies have repeatedly called for even lower barriers to cross-border trade
and investment. It is a world where the symbols of material and popular culture are increasingly global:
from Coca-Cola and Starbucks to Sony PlayStations, Facebook, MTV shows, Disney films, IKEA
stores, and Apple iPads and iPhones. It is also a world in which vigorous and vocal groups protest
against globalization, which they blame for a list of ills, from unemployment in developed nations to
environmental degradation and the Americanization of local culture.
For businesses, this globalization process has produced many opportunities. Firms can expand their
revenues by selling around the world and/or reduce their costs by producing in nations where key inputs,
including labor, are cheap. The global expansion of enterprises has been facilitated by favorable political
and economic trends. Since the collapse of communism at the end of the 1980s, the pendulum of public
policy in nation after nation has swung toward the free market end of the economic spectrum. Regulatory
and administrative barriers to doing business in foreign nations have been reduced, while those nations
have often transformed their economies, privatizing state-owned enterprises, deregulating markets,
increasing competition, and welcoming investment by foreign businesses. This has allowed businesses
both large and small, from both advanced nations and developing nations, to expand internationally.
As globalization unfolds, it is transforming industries and creating anxiety among those who believed
their jobs were protected from foreign competition. Historically, while many workers in manufacturing
industries worried about the impact foreign competition might have on their jobs, workers in service
industries felt more secure. Now, this too is changing. Advances in technology, lower transportation
costs, and the rise of skilled workers in developing countries imply that many services no longer need to
be performed where they are delivered. The same is true of some accounting services. Today, many
individual U.S. tax returns are compiled in India. Indian accountants, trained in U.S. tax rules, perform
work for U.S. accounting firms.3 They access individual tax returns stored on computers in the United
States, perform routine calculations, and save their work so that it can be inspected by a U.S. accountant,
IB-Ch_01.indd 4 3/24/2014 3:29:48 PM
G l o b a l i z a t i o n 5
who then bills clients. As the best-selling author Thomas Friedman has argued, the world is becoming
flat.4 People living in developed nations no longer have the playing field tilted in their favor. Increasingly,
enterprising individuals based in India, China, or Brazil have the same opportunities to better themselves
as those living in western Europe, the United States, or Canada.