Paper Help

1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%

2
Less than Satisfactory
65.00%

3
Satisfactory
75.00%

4
Good
85.00%

5
Excellent
100.00%

70.0 %Content

30.0 %Selection of Foundational Values From 4 Levels (Individual, Interpersonal, Organizational, and Societal) and Discussion of Relationship to Leadership Behaviors

Selection of foundational values and discussion of relationship to leadership values is missing or incomplete.

Selection of foundational values and discussion of relationship to leadership values is insufficiently developed. Values may be missing from one or more levels and/or the connection between values and leadership behaviors is unclear.

Values from each of the four levels are clearly identified and there is an adequate discussion of the connection between values and leadership behaviors. The connection between some values and leadership behaviors may be slightly unclear.

Values from each of the four levels are clearly identified and there is a specific connection made between each value and corresponding leadership behaviors.

Values from each of the four levels are clearly identified and there is a specific connection made between each value and corresponding leadership behaviors. Discussion demonstrates sophisticated understanding of how leadership behaviors are influenced by one's values.

70.0 %Content

20.0 %Identification of How a Personal Model of Leadership Helps Create a Sense of Meaning and Purpose for Self, Others, Organization, and Society

Identification of how personal model of leadership helps create a sense of meaning and purpose for self, others, organizations, and society is missing or incomplete.

Identification of how personal model of leadership helps create a sense of meaning and purpose for self, others, organizations, and society is insufficiently developed.

Identification of how personal model of leadership helps create a sense of meaning and purpose for self, others, organizations, and society is adequately developed. Discussion of meaning for one or two perspectives may need additional development.

Identification of how personal model of leadership helps create a sense of meaning and purpose for self, others, organizations, and society is well-developed. Some specific examples are included.

Identification of how personal model of leadership helps create a sense of meaning and purpose for self, others, organizations, and society is compellingly developed with multiple specific examples.

70.0 %Content

20.0 %Identification of Impact of Contributions to Self, Others, Organization, and Society

Identification of impact of contributions to self, others, organization, and society is missing or incomplete.

Identification of impact of contributions to self, others, organization, and society is insufficiently developed.

Identification of impact of contributions to self, others, organization, and society is adequately developed. Discussion of impact for one or two perspectives may need additional development.

Identification of impact of contributions to self, others, organization, and society is well-developed. Some specific examples are included.

Identification of impact of contributions to self, others, organization, and society is compellingly developed with multiple specific examples.

20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.

Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.

Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent.

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic.

Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion.

Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner.

20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

10.0 %Format

10.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.

Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

All format elements are correct.

100 %Total Weightage