Response paper for

PHIL 201

Response Paper Grading Rubric

Criteria

Levels of Achievement

Points Earned

Good/Excellent

Fair/Competent

Deficient

Content – Development

100 to 120 points

  • Major points are stated clearly and are well-supported.

  • Content is persuasive and comprehensive.

  • Content and purpose of the writing is clear.

  • Thesis has a strong claim.

  • The audience is clear and appropriate for the topic.

  • Supportive information (if required) is strong and addresses writing focus.

60 to 99 points

  • Major points are addressed but clarity or support is limited.

  • Content is somewhat persuasive or comprehensive.

  • Content is inconsistent (lack of clear purpose and/or clarity).

  • Thesis could be stronger.

  • Supportive information (if required) needs strengthening or does not address writing concepts.

0 to 59 points

  • Major points are unclear and/or insufficiently supported.

  • Content is missing essentials.

  • Content has unsatisfactory purpose, focus, and clarity.

  • Supportive information (if required) is missing.

Content – Organization and Structure

30 to 40 points

  • Writing is well-structured, clear, and easy to follow.

  • Introduction compellingly forecasts the topic and thesis.

  • Each paragraph is unified and has a clear central idea.

  • Transitional wording is present throughout the writing.

  • Conclusion is a logical end to the writing.

15 to 29 points

  • Adequately organized with some areas difficult to follow.

  • Introduction needs to provide a stronger gateway into the writing.

  • Some paragraphs lack unity.

  • Better transitions are needed to provide fluency of ideas.

  • Conclusion is trite or barely serves its purpose.

0 to 14 points

  • Organization and structure detract from the writer’s message.

  • Introduction and/or conclusion is incomplete or missing.

  • Paragraphs are not unified (more than one topic/missing or inadequate controlling and concluding sentences).

  • Transitions are missing.

  • Conclusion, if present, fails to serve its purpose.

Form – Grammar and Diction

15 to 20 points

  • The writing reflects grammatical, punctuation, and spelling standards.

  • Language is accurate, appropriate, and effective.

  • Writing’s tone is appropriate and highly effective.

8 to 14 points

  • The writing contains some grammatical, punctuation, and/or spelling errors.

  • Language is unclear, awkward or inappropriate in parts.

  • The writing’s tone is generally appropriate and moderately effective.

0 to 7 points

  • The writing contains many grammatical, punctuation and/or spelling errors.

  • Language use is largely inaccurate or inappropriate.

  • The writing’s tone is ineffective and/or inappropriate.

Form – Format

15 to 20 points

  • Writing correctly follows formatting guidelines.

  • Parenthetical and bibliographical source citations are used correctly and appropriately.

8 to 14 points

  • Writing follows most formatting guidelines, but some flaws are detected.

  • Parenthetical and bibliographical source citations are incorrectly formatted or used.

0 to 7 points

  • Writing lacks many elements of correct formatting.

  • Parenthetical and bibliographical source citations and/or references are not provided.

Total

/200

Instructor’s Comments: