Cultural and knowledge

	1 No submission 0.00%	2 Insufficient 65.00%	3 Approaching 75.00%	4 Acceptable 85.00%	5 Target 100.00%
80.0 %Content
40.0 %Analysis discusses the assignment concepts of deep culture in the context of the selected case study	Not addressed.	Analysis does not discuss all of, or only cursorily discusses the assignment concepts of deep culture in the context of the selected case study. Few and/or inadequate examples are provided to support the analysis.	Analysis broadly discusses all of the assignment concepts of deep culture in the context of the selected case study. Simplistic examples are provided to support the analysis.	Analysis clearly discusses all of the assignment concepts of deep culture in the context of the selected case study. Specific, appropriate examples are provided to reinforce analysis and selected readings reinforce ideas.	Analysis thoroughly discusses all of the assignment concepts of deep culture in the context of the selected case study. Thoughtful, accurate examples are provided to reinforce the analysis.
40.0 %Analysis includes specific advice to the teacher in the chosen case study to help him or her respond more appropriately to the student/family	Not addressed.	Analysis does not include specific advice to the teacher in the chosen case study to help him or her respond more appropriately to the student/family. If analysis is included, it is brief with little to no effect.	Analysis includes simplistic advice to the teacher in the chosen case study to help him or her respond more appropriately to the student/family. The advice generally aligns to the cited resources.	Analysis includes appropriate, specific advice to the teacher in the chosen case study to help him or her respond more appropriately to the student/family. The advice is clearly supported by the cited resources.	Analysis includes realistic, well-informed advice to the teacher in the chosen case study to help him or her respond more appropriately to the student/family. The advice is fully substantiated by the cited resources.
17.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
6.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose	Not addressed.	Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.	Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.	Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive, reflective of the arguments, and appropriate to the purpose.	Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive; contained within the thesis is the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
6.0 %Paragraph Development and Transitions	Not addressed.	Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident.	Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other.	A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to purpose.	There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph structure is seamless.
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)	Not addressed.	Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.	Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.	Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.	Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
3.0 %Format
1.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)	Not addressed.	Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.	Appropriate template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.	Appropriate template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.	All format elements are correct.
2.0 %Research Citations (in-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment)	Not addressed.	Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.	Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present.	Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and appropriate style is usually correct.	In-text citations and a reference page are complete. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.