For this milestone, take your case report from PSY 622 and prepare a psychological assessment report that demonstrates use of objective testing data. How do classic and contemporary psychology theories support the claims you have made in your diagnostic c

PSY 626 Final Project Milestone Two Guidelines and Rubric Prompt : For this milestone, take your case report from PSY 622 and develop a psychological assessment report . This milestone should fulfill Part VI of the final project: VI. Psychological Assessment Report A. Prepare a psychological assessment report that demonstrates use of objective testing data. B. How do classic and contemporary psychology theories support the claims you h ave made in your diagnostic consultation? Make sure your assessment report accounts for the many possible avenues for gathering evidence in legal situations. You will likely rely on memory in some way, so make sure to discuss any limitations that you wil l bring to your assessment report. If possible, include measures that you learned about in your previous courses as protective mechanisms against the use of memory. Also, make sure you explain why you are using the assessments you selected. This informatio n is often very important should the report be used in a legal proceeding. Note: Do not simply cut and paste your assessment choices from PSY 622. Incorporate the feedback given to you in that course and expand or change your assessment choices in order to best fit the current scenario. Remember you were hired by a law firm to create the final report. Guidelines for Submission : You should submit a well -developed psychological assessment report for the case study client from PSY 622. Your paper must be su bmitted as a 2 –3 page Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12 -point Times New Roman font, one -inch margins, and sources cited in APA format. Instructor Feedback: This activity uses an integrated rubric in Blackboard. Students can view instructor f eedback in the Grade Center. For more information, review these instructions . Critical Elements Exemplary (100% ) Proficient (90% ) Needs Improvement (70% ) Not Evident (0% ) Value Psychological Assessment Report: Report Meets “Proficient” criteria and uses industry -specific language to establish expertise Prepares a comprehensive psychological assessment report that demonstrate s use of objective testing data Prepares a diagnostic consultation report but with gaps in detail, or does not demonstrate use of objective testing d ata Does not prepare a diagnostic consultation report 17 Psychological Assessment Report: Theories Meets “Proficient” criteria and discussion draws insightful connections between theories and the practice of forensic psychology Convincingly supports claims with classic and c ontemporary psychology theories Supports claims with classic or contemporary psy chology theories, but not both; or support is unconvincin g or insufficient in other ways Does not support claims 17 Psychological Assessment Report: Qualifications Meets “Proficient” criteria and cites specific, relevant examples to establish a ro bust con text for the discussion Comprehensively articulates qualifications to d iscuss psychological assessment Articulates qualifications but with gaps in details that may l ead to inadmissibility in court Does not articul ate professional qualifications 17 Psychological Assessment Report: Test and Assessment Selection Meets “Proficient” criteria and cites specific studies establishing the professional crit eria for each assessment choice Comprehensively explains all tests and assessment choices, including the strength s and weaknesses of each choice Discusses why tests and assessments were selected, but does not clarify strengths and weaknesses of choices and leaves gaps in the details of those choices Does not discuss why tests a nd assessment choices were made 17 Psychological Assessment Report:

Ethical Standards Meets “Proficient” criteria and uses industry -specific language to establish expertise Discusses ethical standards of psychological assessment and shows a ful l understanding of those ethics Discusses ethical standards of assessment but does not show full clarity and unders tanding of those ethics Does not discuss ethical standa rds of psychological assessment 17 Articulation of Response Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is presented in a professional and easy -to-read format Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulati on of main ideas Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas 15 Earned Total 100%