Wk 2
Rubric: Written Assignment 2
Criteria | Satisfactory | Needs Improvement | Not Evident |
Population (10% of Grade) | Clearly describes the population being studied in the article | There are gaps in the description of the population being studied | Does not describe the population being studied in the article |
Data Collected: Sample Chosen (10% of Grade) | Clearly describes how the sample was chosen | There are gaps in the description of how the sample was chosen | Does not describe how the sample was chosen |
Data Collected: Is Sample Representative of Population (20% of Grade) | Discusses if the sample is representative of the population and provides relevant examples to support claims | Discusses if the sample is representative of the population, but does not provides relevant examples to support claims | Does not discuss if the sample is representative of the population |
Data Collected: Experiment or Study (10% of Grade) | States if the article is an experiment or a study and supports claim | States if the article is an experiment or a study, but does not support claim | Does not state if the article is an experiment or a study |
Data Collected: Design (30% of Grade) | Clearly describes how the experiment or study was designed | There are gaps in the description of how the experiment or study was designed | Does not describe how the experiment or study was designed |
Results (15% of Grade) | Discusses if the results of the experiment/study could be applied to other youth detention centers and clearly explains why | Discusses if the results of the experiment/study could be applied to other youth detention centers, but does not clearly explain why | Does not discuss if the results of the experiment/study could be applied to other youth detention centers |
Writing Mechanics (5% of Grade) | Submission is well organized and contains no errors regarding spelling or grammar | Errors in organization, spelling, or grammar but submission is still readable | Errors in organization, spelling, or grammar affect the readability of the submission |