pro-social behavior

Unsatisfactory 0.00%	2 Less than Satisfactory 65.00%	3 Satisfactory 75.00%	4 Good 85.00%	5 Excellent 100.00%
70.0 %Content
15.0 %Describe your implementation of kindness, what did you do, how did you approach the idea, where did you implement it and to whom?	Description of implementation of kindness, what was done, how the idea was approach and where it was implement and to whom is missing.	Description of implementation of kindness, what was done, how the idea was approach and where it was implement and to whom is vague or inadequate.	Description of implementation of kindness, what was done, how the idea was approach and where it was implement and to whom is adequate.	Description of implementation of kindness, what was done, how the idea was approach and where it was implement and to whom is clear.	Description of implementation of kindness, what was done, how the idea was approach and where it was implement and to whom is concise and thoughtful.
20.0 %Describe the reactions you perceive from others and yourself.	Description of reactions is missing.	Description of reactions is vague or inadequate.	Description of reactions is adequate.	Description of reactions is clear.	Description of reactions is thorough and makes some connection to research.
15.0 %Describe what you learn about prosocial behavior from this exercise. Compare the actual application of the behavior relative to this topic material.	Description of learning from exercise and comparison of actual application and topic material is missing.	Description of learning from exercise and comparison of actual application and topic material is vague or inadequate.	Description of learning from exercise and comparison of actual application and topic material is adequate.	Description of learning from exercise and comparison of actual application and topic material is clear and makes some connection to research.	Description of learning from exercise and comparison of actual application and topic material is thoughtful and well-researched, makes relevant connections to current research.
20.0 %If you are a faith based person, explain how your faith helped you implement your helping behavior. If you are not a faith based person, explain what philosophy, belief system, or values you connected to helping behavior.	Explanation of how faith, philosophy, belief system, or values helped to implement behavior is missing.	Explanation of how faith, philosophy, belief system, or values helped to implement behavior is vague or inadequate.	Explanation of how faith, philosophy, belief system, or values helped to implement behavior is adequate.	Explanation of how faith, philosophy, belief system, or values helped to implement behavior is clear and makes some connection to research.	Explanation of how faith, philosophy, belief system, or values helped to implement behavior is thorough and well-researched, makes relevant connections to current research.
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

Top of Form

7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose	Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.	Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.	Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.	Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.	Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction	Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.	Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.	Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.	Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.	Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)	Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.	Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.	Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.	Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.	Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
10.0 %Format
5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)	Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.	Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.	Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.	Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.	All format elements are correct.
5.0 %Research Citations (in-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style)	No reference page is included. No citations are used.	Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.	Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present.	Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct.	In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
100 %Total Weightage

Bottom of Form