Cultural Competency
Analyzing Content for Cultural Competency
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
80.0 %Content |
| ||||||
40.0 %Text analysis uses the 10 guidelines mentioned in the article to evaluate a piece of children?s literature for bias | Not addressed. | Text analysis does not use the 10 guidelines mentioned in the article to evaluate a piece of children?s literature for bias. | Text analysis uses the 10 guidelines mentioned in the article to evaluate a piece of children?s literature for bias. Evaluation takes a general stance regarding the inclusion of or lack of bias. | Text analysis uses the 10 guidelines mentioned in the article to evaluate a piece of children?s literature for bias. Evaluation takes a clear stance regarding the inclusion of or lack of bias. Examples are provided to reinforce the analysis. | Text analysis uses the 10 guidelines mentioned in the article to evaluate a piece of children?s literature for bias. Evaluation is thorough and takes a firm stance regarding the inclusion of or lack of bias. Thoughtful, compelling examples are provided to reinforce the analysis. | ||
40.0 %Analysis includes description of where the teacher candidate places the text on the Cultural Competence Continuum and why | Not addressed. | Response incorrectly places text on the Cultural Competency Continuum and fails to include a reasonable rationale. | Response may incorrectly place text on the Cultural Competence Continuum. Provides general rationale regarding the placement. | Response appropriately places text on the Cultural Competence Continuum with a clear rationale regarding the placement | Response clearly and accurately describes where the text falls on the Cultural Competence Continuum with a convincing and thoughtful rationale regarding the placement. | ||
17.0 %Organization and Effectiveness |
| ||||||
6.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose | Not addressed. | Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. | Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. | Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive, reflective of the arguments, and appropriate to the purpose. | Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive; contained within the thesis is the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. | ||
17.0 %Organization and Effectiveness |
| ||||||
6.0 %Paragraph Development and Transitions | Not addressed. | Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident. | Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other. | A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to purpose. | There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph structure is seamless. | ||
17.0 %Organization and Effectiveness |
| ||||||
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | Not addressed. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. | ||
3.0 %Format |
| ||||||
1.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) | Not addressed. | Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. | Appropriate template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. | Appropriate template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. | All format elements are correct. | ||
2.0 %Research Citations (in-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment) | Not addressed. | Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. | Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. | Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and appropriate style is usually correct. | In-text citations and a reference page are complete. The documentation of cited sources is free of error. | ||
100 %Total Weightage |
|