Strategic Leadership and Change Paper, Part III
Strategic Leadership and Change II Grading Guide LDR/535 Version 2 |
Learning Team Assignment: Strategic Leadership and Change Paper, Part II
Purpose of Assignment
This is Part II of the three-part team assignment designed to provide students with the opportunity to develop a critical analysis of a large-scale change within a contemporary organization. Part II is a complete draft of the paper. Students will describe the organization chosen, the change undertaken, and the critical leadership issues surrounding the change. This paper is designed to be a critical analysis and not a history lesson. Students must substantiate all points with references to past large-scale change and/or research and explain why the points are relevant.
Resources Required
Week 2, Strategic Leadership and Change Paper, Part I
Grading Guide
Content 70 Percent | Met | Partially Met | Not Met | Comments: |
The paper is a draft version of the final paper. |
| |||
The paper includes an introduction that includes a description of the industry and the selected organization. | The paper provided a clear summary of the organization in the respective industry. The paper did not clearly include a description of the industry. Review comments in the paper. | |||
The paper includes a description of the executive leadership structure. | The paper provided a clear summary of the executive leadership structure. The paper explained both divisional leadership structures for Comcast. Make sure to the leadership structure. Review comments in the paper. | |||
The paper includes an analysis of the effectiveness of the current leadership team in providing strategic leadership. | The paper provided a brief analysis of the effectiveness of the current leadership team utilizing strategic leadership. | |||
The paper includes a critique of the organization’s mission and vision statements. | The paper included a thorough analysis of Comcast’s mission and vision statement. | |||
The paper includes a discussion of whether or not the organization’s long-term vision is adaptive and supports change, or is rigid and resists change. | The paper provided a clear and concise of how the long-term vision is adaptive in supporting change. | |||
The paper includes a description of the change the organization underwent. | The paper clearly explained the change. | |||
The paper includes a description of the role leadership played during the change. | The paper provided a clear overview of the role leadership played during the change. | |||
The paper includes an evaluation of the change that was undergone and whether or not it was successful. | The paper analyzed the organizational structure change with discussing the continued success. | |||
The paper includes a description of how the organization dealt with resistance to the change. | The paper provided an overview of how the company dealt with resistance. | |||
The paper includes a discussion of the role of mindful leadership in mitigating the resistance to change. | The paper analyzed the role leadership played in reducing resistance to change through mindful leadership. | |||
The paper includes a discussion of the role of intrapreneurial and entrepreneurial competencies as applied to organizational leadership during times of change. | The paper clearly explained how Comcast’s leadership utilizes intrapreneurial and entrepreneurial competencies. | |||
The paper is between 1,750- to 2,450-words in length. | ||||
Total Available | Total Earned | |||
5.5 | 5.0 | |||
Writing Guidelines 30 Percent | Met | Partially Met | Not Met | Comments: |
The paper—including tables and graphs, headings, title page, and reference page—is consistent with APA formatting guidelines and meets course-level requirements. | Major APA errors in heading and paragraph formatting. Review changes and comments throughout the paper. Missing at least 2 peer reviewed sources. 2 Peer reviewed sources are scholarly journals you can search for through the UOP Library. | |||
Intellectual property is recognized with in-text citations and a reference page. | The paper met the requirements. | |||
Paragraph and sentence transitions are present, logical, and maintain the flow throughout the paper. | ||||
Sentences are complete, clear, and concise. | . | |||
Rules of grammar and usage are followed including spelling and punctuation. | Grammar errors. Review comments and changes in the paper. | |||
Total Available | Total Earned | |||
| 2.5 | 2.0 | ||
Assignment Total | # | 7.0 | ||
Additional comments: |
Copyright © 2015 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.