Final paper
LIST OF ACCEPTABLE PRIMARY RESOURCES FOR THE WEEK
THREE ASSIGNMENT AND WEEK FIVE FINAL PAPER
These are the primary resources that you can cite when explaining a moral theory in order to fulfill the relevant portion ofthe resources requirement.
* Indicates readings included in the “Required Readings” portion of the course.
Utilitarianism
*Mill, John Stuart. Utilitarianism, in the original version in the textbook(see attached file utilitarianism for textbook version), • See the guidance for the required portions of the text.
Haines, W. (n.d.). Consequentialism. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from
http://www.iep.utm.edu/conseque/
Singer, P. (2003). Voluntary euthanasia: A utilitarian perspective. Bioethics, 17(5/6), 526-541. ( see attached file voluntary euthanasis)
Deontology
*Kant, Immanuel. Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals in the original version in the textbook See attached file Kant
O’Neill, O. (1993). A simplified account of Kant’s ethics. In T. Regan (Ed.) Matters of Life and Death, 411-415.
Retrieved from http://users.manchester.edu/Facstaff/SSNaragon/Online/texts/201/O'Neill,%20Kant.pdf
Virtue Ethics
*Aristotle. (1931). Nicomachean ethics. (W.D. Ross, Trans.). Oxford, GBR: Clarendon Press. Retrieved from http://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/8438/pg8438.html See attached file Nicomachean
Hursthouse, R. (2012). Virtue ethics. In E. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-virtue/
MacIntyre, A. (1984). After virtue. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
See attached file After Virtue
Feminist/Care Ethics
*Held, V. “Feminist transformations of moral theory.” ( see attached file)
• Included in Chapter 6 of the text. See the guidance for the required portions of the text.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Retrieved from http://courseweb.stthomas.edu/sjlaumakis/Reading 4-GILLIGAN.pdf
Gilligan presents her analysis of the differences between ethical responses in young boys and young girls and she reinterprets female responses through the lens of what has become known as “care ethics.”
*Noddings, N. (2010). Maternal factor: Two paths to morality. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. (213-220) (Ebook)
file:///C:/Users/mspri/Downloads/The_Maternal_Factor_Two_Paths_to_Morality_1_%20(1).pdf
