Assignment 3

Points: 170	Assignment 3: Law Enforcement Challenges
Criteria	Unacceptable Below 60% F	Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D	Fair 70-79% C	Proficient 80-89% B	Exemplary 90-100% A
1. Explain, in detail, what you believe to be the greatest challenge facing law enforcement agencies investigating exploitation, cyber stalking, and obscenity. Provide a rationale for your response. Weight: 30%	Did not submit or incompletely explained, in detail, what you believe to be the greatest challenge facing law enforcement agencies investigating exploitation, cyber stalking, and obscenity. Did not submit or incompletely provided a rationale for your response.	Insufficientlyexplained, in detail, what you believe to be the greatest challenge facing law enforcement agencies investigating exploitation, cyber stalking, and obscenity. Insufficiently provided a rationale for your response.	Partiallyexplained, in detail, what you believe to be the greatest challenge facing law enforcement agencies investigating exploitation, cyber stalking, and obscenity. Partiallyprovided a rationale for your response.	Satisfactorily explained, in detail, what you believe to be the greatest challenge facing law enforcement agencies investigating exploitation, cyber stalking, and obscenity. Satisfactorily provided a rationale for your response.	Thoroughlyexplained, in detail, what you believe to be the greatest challenge facing law enforcement agencies investigating exploitation, cyber stalking, and obscenity. Thoroughlyprovided a rationale for your response.
2. Identify the specific challenges that overlapping of jurisdictions pose in the fight against cyber-crime. Next, propose salient solution(s) for overcoming the challenges in question. Justify your response. Weight: 30%	Did not submit or incompletely identified the specific challenges that overlapping of jurisdictions pose in the fight against cyber-crime. Did not submit or incompletely proposed salient solution(s) for overcoming the challenges in question. Did not submit or incompletely justified your response.	Insufficientlyidentified the specific challenges that overlapping of jurisdictions pose in the fight against cyber-crime. Insufficientlyproposed salient solution(s) for overcoming the challenges in question. Insufficientlyjustified your response.	Partiallyidentified the specific challenges that overlapping of jurisdictions pose in the fight against cyber-crime. Partiallyproposed salient solution(s) for overcoming the challenges in question. Partiallyjustified your response.	Satisfactorilyidentified the specific challenges that overlapping of jurisdictions pose in the fight against cyber-crime. Satisfactorily proposed salient solution(s) for overcoming the challenges in question. Satisfactorily justified your response.	Thoroughly identified the specific challenges that overlapping of jurisdictions pose in the fight against cyber-crime. Thoroughly proposed salient solution(s) for overcoming the challenges in question. Thoroughly justified your response.
3. Discuss whether or not law officers from different states should have the ability to work with one another when a cyber-crime is carried out across state lines. Weight: 25%	Did not submit or incompletely discussed whether or not law officers from different states should have the ability to work with one another when a cyber-crime is carried out across state lines.	Insufficiently discussed whether or not law officers from different states should have the ability to work with one another when a cyber-crime is carried out across state lines.	Partially discussed whether or not law officers from different states should have the ability to work with one another when a cyber-crime is carried out across state lines.	Satisfactorily discussed whether or not law officers from different states should have the ability to work with one another when a cyber-crime is carried out across state lines.	Thoroughly discussed whether or not law officers from different states should have the ability to work with one another when a cyber-crime is carried out across state lines.
4. 3 references Weight: 5%	No references provided	Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices.	Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices.	Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.	Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.
5. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements Weight: 10%	More than 8 errors present	7-8 errors present	5-6 errors present	3-4 errors present	0-2 errors present