PoL-SP02
- PSY 614 Module Two Reaction Paper Rubric
Prompt: Examine the fictional case study of the People's Bank of Bradbury (found in the Module Two Resources folder) and describe the problems and issues therein. Discuss how the leader’s style and approach could have led to the problems experienced by the bank. Suggest possible solutions. Craft a one- to two-page response to this prompt.
Format: Double-spaced Word document, 12-point Times New Roman font, 1-inch margins, APA format. Page length requirements: one to two pages, not including title page and references.
Instructor Feedback: Students can find their feedback in the Grade Center.
| Critical Elements | Exemplary | Proficient | Needs Improvement | Not Evident | Value | |
| Leadership Style and Approach | Meets “Proficient” criteria and substantiates claims with scholarly research (27-30) | Explains the leadership style and approach using examples (24-26) | Does not sufficiently explain leadership style and approach using examples (21-23) | Does not explain leadership style and approach (0-20) | 30 | |
| Leadership: Problems | Meets “Proficient” criteria and substantiates solutions with scholarly research (27-30) | Analyzes the problems with the leadership style and approach and proposes solutions (24-26) | Does not sufficiently identify the problems with the leadership style and approach or propose solutions (21-23) | The problems and issues are not evident (0-20) | 30 | |
| Organization | Applies highly effective pattern of organization around a logical flow (introduction, body, and conclusion) to effectively communicate the main ideas of the paper (18-20) | Applies clear pattern of organization around a logical flow (introduction, body, and conclusion) to effectively communicate the main ideas of the paper (16-17) | Does not sufficiently apply clear pattern of organization around a logical flow (introduction, body, and conclusion) to effectively communicate the main ideas of the paper (14-15) | Organization of ideas is not evident (0-13) | 20 | |
| Articulation of Response | Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, and syntax and is presented in a professional and easy-to-read format (18-20) | Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or syntax (16-17) | Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or syntax that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas (14-15) | Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or syntax that prevent understanding of ideas (0-13) | 20 | |
| Earned Total Comments: | 100% | |||||
