Policy writing essay exam

1 | P a g e F INAL EXAM Policy Formulation and Implementation - PA 6302 A1 Summer 2017 I NSTRUCTIONS The controversy over “Sanctuary Cities” has been a point in the changing immigration landscape that has stirred much debate and emotion. Please be prepared to discuss the pertinent issues surrounding the sanctuary cities issue, the current legal requirements that law enforcement officers must currently abide and any pending or potential legislation on this matter. After understanding the background, please discuss the practical ramifications to the US immigration policy, its impact ( fiscal and otherwise) and discuss the impact and responsibilities of federal, state and local governments in this issue. Also, policy evaluation is imp ortant aspect of our discussion, so please discuss in some depth a process by which consensus — either for or against — may be reached on this issue . How do we know it will work? And what should we prepared to do if it does not? Due Date and time: plea se email your respon ses to me in MS Word or PDF format at [email protected] by our clas s time, 6:30PM, on Wednesday, June 28 . E XAM F ORMAT I would like your response in an essay format. P lease k eep your responses con cise and to the point, but also thorough . P lease maintain the following headings or sections to your response: 1. Issue History and Relevant Facts: in this section, please outline the relevant facts and brief history as it relates to this issue. B e sure to high light the point of controvers y, or debat e regarding this issue. P lease do not provide political commentary but rather thoughtful analysis of this issue. 2. Potential Areas for C onse nsus or R esolution: I am interested to know that you have thought around this issue and h ave g iven reasonable analysis to possible issues where consensus may be gained. T his is much the same manner which we discussed in class and I expect to s ee your insight and thought process on display. 3. Poli cy Evaluation: O nce action is taken on this is sue that you have sugg ested above, please discuss a process or mechanism by which to evaluate if this was successful . How do we know it will work? And what should we prepared to do if it does not? #####dfWERVSDAFBsdfBsdQWEFVBAEF SDFV 12315100VB 2 | P a g e Beyond the format indicated above, I am flexible so long as I can f ollow your thought process. I have no recommendations on page limits other than to r eiterate that you be concise and thorough . Below is an article that provides som e background on this issue: Dallas Joins Lawsuit Over Sanctuary Cities Bill BY TRIBUNE NEW S SERVICE | JUNE 8, 2017 By Elvia Limón and Robert Wilonsky Dallas is joining some other Texas cities, including Austin and San Antonio, in taking on the state's so -called "sanctuary city" law. Mayor Mike Rawlings made the announcement Wednesday afternoon, calling SB4 "unconstitutional" and a law that "greatly infringes on the city's ability to protect" the public.

According to Rawlings, the city attorney has "serious constitutional concerns" with the new measure, which goes into effect Sept. 1. Rawlings said after Wednesday's council meeting that he had already spoken with Austin Mayor Steve Adler and San Antonio Mayor Ivy Taylor about potential litigation. "I told them both this was a serious issue," Rawlings said. A Sa n Antonio federal district court announced Wednesday it would consolidate the lawsuits filed by all of the cities against the bill and designate the city of El Cenizo as the lead plaintiff. A hearing in that case is set for June 26. Critics call SB4 the "s how -me -your -papers law," because it allows law enforcement to question the immigration status of anyone who has been lawfully arrested and detained. In addition, it could punish cities, counties and universities who do not enforce the law. And police chief s, county sheriffs and constables who do not enforce the law could face criminal charges, and local jurisdictions could be fined up to $25,000 per violation per day. Gov. Greg Abbott and other supporters of SB4 say it would protect Texans from crimes commi tted by those who are in the country illegally. Dallas makes its decision 3 | P a g e The Dallas city code allows the city attorney to initiate litigation without the council's approval.

Rawlings made his announcement moments after the City Council met with City Attorney Larry Casto behind closed doors. Rawlings said he wanted to make sure the council was aligned before Dallas joined the fray. He said Wednesday that a majority of the council agreed with Casto's recommendation to take on the state. "We are not a sanctuary city," he said. "We live by the national laws, and now the question is who's boss in all this. And this is an unfunded mandate. They're telling us how our police officers should spend their time and not giving us any money to do that." Council member Philip Kingston said last month, during an SB4 protest in Austin, that Dalla s would eventually join the fight against the legislation. The official decision by Dallas to do just that followed a demonstration by about 60 protesters at City Hall Wednesday morning aimed at pressuring city leaders into challenging the controversial bill, which was signed by Gov. Greg Abbott last month. Members of the Workers Defense Project, Texas Organizing Project and other local activists were among the protesters. Rawlings attended the rally and told the group the City Council would discuss the iss ue later during executive session. Rawlings said then that he is concerned about how the law would affect his and other council members' roles in the community. "My job, the job of the pro tem and the job of the council is to keep all citizens safe," the m ayor said. "We want to have a safe environment so they can get married and do the things they have to do." Rawlings said the law asks too much of police by making them enforce federal immigration laws in addition to focusing on "safety first." "Time and ti me again, police chiefs and police associations across the state have said that SB4 is not a safe bill," he said. 4 | P a g e 'Stop this hateful law' Carla Hernandez said she decided to join the protesters because she did not feel safe. Hernandez, 37, said she was afr aid she would be separated from her children. "I've had panic attacks when I've had to pick up my children," Hernandez said. "We want the mayor to give us support to join the lawsuit. I have confidence that there's more support than hate." During the counc il meeting following the protest, several opponents of the law spoke to the council and pleaded with them not to support the law. Manuela Castro said she knew of people who have already been detained and deported and said the measure would eventually hurt Dallas businesses that depend on immigrant labor. "The law hasn't gone into effect and there are already people who have been detained and police officers who are asking for their papers," she said. "Please help us stop this hateful law." Solia Chaver of L ancaster told the city council she worries about how the sanctuary cities law will affect immigrants protected under temporary visas and permits, such as the Defered Action for Childhood Arrivals for unauthorized immigrants who came to the U.S. as children and Temporary Protected Status for immigrants who are unable to return safely to their country of origin. "We have a lot of students who are currently protected by DACA, and people like me, who are protected under TPS," she said. "If the law goes into eff ect, they will only give us three months to renew our paperwork. So what's going to happen to us? Are we also going to be deported?" Law enforcement weighs in Two members of the law enforcement community -- Executive Chief Deputy Jesse Flores and Chief De puty Jesse Herrera from the Dallas County Sheriff's Department --also addressed the Dallas council about SB4. Flores said that even though the sheriff's department has always cooperated with the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency when handli ng criminals who are unauthorized immigrants, he believed the law could lead to fewer reported crimes by community members who will be afraid to interact with law enforcement. 5 | P a g e "If members of the community are afraid to come forward and report crimes due to fear of deportation, then those crimes will not be reported or investigated," Flores said. "Senate Bill 4 will also affect vulnerable people at risk, because women and children are least likely to come forward if they are undocumented. We believe our comm unity is safer when they report crimes without fear of deportation." In addition to those concerns, there was evidence the bill is already beginning to impact business in the state. The American Immigration Lawyers Association, a 15,000 -member association of attorneys and law professors announced Wednesday that it would relocate its 2018 convention out of Grapevine in response to the passing of SB4. About 3,000 people were expected to attend the three -day event. Staff Writer Tristan Hallman contributed to this report. (c)2017 The Dallas Morning News