Fight Club and American Psycho : Crisis of Masculinit [Pin It] I want 6 sources in total please i shall give you 3 and you get the other 3 none from wikepdia ofcourse. The essay is about the crisis of masculinity that the movies and the charact

FLM 5410 Gender in Film RESEARCH PAPER GUIDELINES

Paper Length: 2000 words. Due Wed 28 JUNE (Double spaced, 12 size, etc.)

You must submit it also on Safe Assign through Blackboard.

Sources: You must include at least 6 “works cited” in your paper. Your Works Cited list at the end must include at least 3 references to sources listed in your syllabus. That can include your text books, class handouts or books on syllabus from supplementary texts. The other references can come from other books/websites, not Wikipedia. Use whatever citation system you are comfortable with (MLA, Chicago, Harvard/Oxford) – but be consistent. You must always include page numbers for direct quotes as well as for paraphrasing ideas (which must be cited, with pages given).

Methodology: Discourse Analysis in relation to 2 films.

Topics: You must stick to the research question we have discussed. Failure to do so – or changing your paper topic without prior consultation will result in an “F” grade.

Structure: Your opening will introduce your topic and provide some sort of historical/theoretical contextualization about the key ideas you are working with. Your thesis (central argument) must be in the introductory paragraph which should only be about 150-200 words (see sample below). Then, you should discuss the ideas relevant to your conceptual/theoretical approach (the gaze? fetishization? post feminism? Masculinity in crisis? Lad culture?) and include some background on the historical and/or cultural contexts of your films. This would also 2-3 paragraphs and be about 300 words.

Then go into your films and apply your ideas to each film. Pick out key scenes/aspects of the film that illustrate your ideas. Don’t summarize the whole film but place the idea/scene you are analysing in a specific context related to your ideas. Analyse specific details/meanings generated/ imbedded ideologies, etc. Then analyse your other film with good transitions such as (“unlike in x, y does …” OR “y also uses irony, but its humour is more self deprecating than in x…”)

Each film analysis will be approx. 700 words/3-4 paragraphs for each film. Aim for good transitions as well as a compare/contrast framework. Have a concluding section of 1-2 paragraphs which brings it all together and closes the discussion which will be around 400 words.

You must include direct citations from your secondary sources (so that means at least 8), and if you need to cut down long quotes, you may refer to ideas, etc in footnotes at the bottom or end of the paper. The Bibliography/Works Cited at the end of the paper is not part of the word count.

By Thursday 22 June, please EMAIL ME your THESIS Sentence – which angle you have decided based on our discussion, and me know your two films.

See sample below with the thesis underlined. Therefore, send me an email that would contain films and thesis:

To: [email protected] Films: Unforgiven and 3:10 to Yuma

Thesis sentence: Despite the self-conscious portrayal of “masculinity in crisis”, these two contemporary westerns still re-inscribe a traditional masculinity that promises change but delivers the same heroic formula common to the genre.

SAMPLE opening paragraph that contains the names of the two films (italicized), dates of films and the thesis (that sits well at the end of the opening paragraph).

From gun slinging outlaws to cowboys with boots and spurs, America has always had a soft spot for western movies. But the traditional western has been updated to reflect a lot of changes people’s values and attitudes. As one critic has noted, “as American society changed, the western [and]... characters did as well” (Martynuska, 59). Over the years the western appears to include less racist and sexist stereotypes but still contains fairly traditional ideas of masculinity. The films 3:10 to Yuma (2007) and Unforgiven (1992) break down and deconstruct many characteristics about individual heroes and villains, but their endings reproduce very traditional ideas about masculinity where “the lone cowboy brings justice and civilization [via] male heroics” (Benshoff & Griffin, 259). Despite the self-conscious portrayal of “masculinity in crisis”, these two contemporary westerns still re-inscribe a traditional masculinity that promises change but delivers the same heroic formula common to the genre.

YOUR PAPER WILL BE GRADED BASED ON THE FOLLOWING 4 CATEGORIES: