Cyber Security Project

ISE 510 Final Project Milestone One Guidelines and Rubric Kick off Agenda Overview: You have been hired as a cybers ecurity professional to conduct a security assessment on Limetree Inc. ’s systems and processes to identify the root cause of the security breach, and discover additional vulnerabilities that could impact its operation in the future. Your assessment of Limetree Inc.’s environment will be conducted by reviewing your Final Project Scenario document and Limetree Inc.’s virtual environme nt as presented in the educational video game , Agent Surefire: InfoSec. As part of this assessment, you will incorporate into your analysis the result s of the interview with Jack Sterling ( security manager ) found in the scenario , and you will be able to id entify vulnerabilities related to systems security, personnel and administrative security, and physical security, relating these to the breach. Prompt: For this assignment, y ou are provided an opportunity to conduct a kickoff meeting for the security breach analysis and recommendations (final project ). After reviewing the entire Final Project Guidelines and Rubric document and Final Project Scenario , develop an a genda for the meeting and describe the relevance of each item in your agenda to the risk as sessment. Your agenda to pics should be geared toward collecting additional information or providing clarification that may be missing within the Agent Surefire : Info Sec virtual game environment or the interview of Jack Sterling, the s ecurity manager , from your scenario document . You should be very familiar with Sections I –IV of your final proj ect before completing this kicko ff agenda , which ask s you to analyze the security brea ch, i ts i mpacts, and the company’s incident response following the bre ach . You ma y want to take detailed notes or draft your response to those sections at this point in the course for your final submission later. For this assignment, you are being evaluated on the imp ortance of the agenda to the assessment effort and the level of discu ssion provided in explaining the topics. In the real world , a lot of information that goes into the test plan (Milestone Two in Module Five ) would be derived from this meeting. This assignment validates that you as the student know the right topics to discuss in the meeting with stakeholders that will result in pertinent infor mation for ultimate success of the effort and your final project. Guidelines for Submission : The kickoff a genda should be 3–5 pages in length, using 12 -point Times New Roman font and one -inch margins. Instructor Feedback : This activity uses an integrated rubric in Blackboard. Students can view instructor feedback in the Grade Center. For more in formation, review these instructions . Critical Elements Exemplary (100%) Proficient (90 %) Needs Improvement (70 %) Not Evident (0%) Value Kickoff Agenda: Relevance Meets “Proficient” criteria and expertly describes relevance of each agenda item Describes relevance of each agenda item Describes relevance of each agenda item but response has gaps in accuracy or detail Does not describe relevance of each agenda item 40 Kickoff Agenda: Topics Meets “Proficient” criteria and topics are skillfully geared toward collecting additional information, providing clarification or identifying interview topics for security manager Describes topics and they are geared toward collecting additional information, providing clarification , or identif ying interview t opics for security manager Describes top ics and they are geared toward collecting additional information, providing clarification , or identif ying interview topics for security manager , but they have gaps in accuracy or detail Does not describe topics or topics do not collect additional information, provide clarification , or identify interview topics for security manager 50 Articulation of Response Submission is free of errors related to grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is prese nted in a professional and easy -to-read format Submission has no major errors related to grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization Submission has major errors related to grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas Submission has critical errors related to grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas 10 Total 100%