Business Plan

Grading Rubric:

Rubric Detail

Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.

	EXCELLENT	GOOD	FAIR	POOR
Executive Summary	36 (14.4%) - 40 (16%) The Executive Summary and Program Overview show depth, breadth, and clarity in critical thinking when summarizing the key points of the Business Plan.	32 (12.8%) - 35 (14%) The Executive Summary and Program Overview fully summarize the key points of the Business Plan.	28 (11.2%) - 31 (12.4%) The Executive Summary and Program Overview lack depth, breadth, or clarity in critical thinking when summarizing the key points of the Business Plan.	0 (0%) - 27 (10.8%) The Executive Summary and Program Overview do not address (zero points) or poorly addresses key points related to the Business Plan
Market Analysis	78 (31.2%) - 85 (34%) The Market Analysis shows depth, breath, and clarity in critical thinking when addressing the key points related to the macro and micro implications of market competition, ACO payment incentives to the organization and how the Diabetes Treatment Center will impact economic efficiency.	68 (27.2%) - 77 (30.8%) The Market Analysis fully addresses the key points related to the macro and micro implications of market competition, ACO payment incentives to the organization and how the Diabetes Treatment Center will impact economic efficiency.	59 (23.6%) - 67 (26.8%) The Market Analysis lacks depth, breath, and clarity in critical thinking when addressing the key points related to the macro and micro implications of market competition, ACO payment incentives to the organization and how the Diabetes Treatment Center will impact economic efficiency.	0 (0%) - 58 (23.2%) The Market Analysis does not address (zero points) or poorly addresses the key points related to the macro and micro implications of market competition, ACO payment incentives to the organization and how the Diabetes Treatment Center will impact economic efficiency.
Financial Analysis	78 (31.2%) - 85 (34%) The Financial Analysis and Pro forma are correct and appropriately and accurately shows how the responses were determined.	68 (27.2%) - 77 (30.8%) The Financial Analysis and Pro forma are correct, but fail to appropriately and accurately show how the responses were determined.	59 (23.6%) - 67 (26.8%) Parts of the Financial Analysis and Pro forma are incorrect but appropriately show how the responses were determined.	0 (0%) - 58 (23.2%) The Financial Analysis and Pro forma are not accurate (zero points) or are mostly inaccurate and fail to show how the responses were determined.
Writing	36 (14.4%) - 40 (16%) The paper is well organized, uses scholarly tone, contains original writing and proper paraphrasing, follows APA style, contains very few or no writing and/or spelling errors, and is fully consistent with graduate level writing style.	32 (12.8%) - 35 (14%) The paper is mostly consistent with graduate level writing style and may have some spelling, APA, and writing errors.	28 (11.2%) - 31 (12.4%) The paper is somewhat consistent with graduate level writing style and may have some spelling, APA, and writing errors.	0 (0%) - 27 (10.8%) The paper is well below graduate level writing style expectations for organization, scholarly tone, APA style, and writing, or shows heavy reliance on quoting.
Total Points: 250

EXCELLENT

GOOD

FAIR

POOR

Executive Summary

36 (14.4%) - 40 (16%)

The Executive Summary and Program Overview show depth, breadth, and clarity in critical thinking when summarizing the key points of the Business Plan.

32 (12.8%) - 35 (14%)

The Executive Summary and Program Overview fully summarize the key points of the Business Plan.

28 (11.2%) - 31 (12.4%)

The Executive Summary and Program Overview lack depth, breadth, or clarity in critical thinking when summarizing the key points of the Business Plan.

0 (0%) - 27 (10.8%)

The Executive Summary and Program Overview do not address (zero points) or poorly addresses key points related to the Business Plan

Market Analysis

78 (31.2%) - 85 (34%)

The Market Analysis shows depth, breath, and clarity in critical thinking when addressing the key points related to the macro and micro implications of market competition, ACO payment incentives to the organization and how the Diabetes Treatment Center will impact economic efficiency.

68 (27.2%) - 77 (30.8%)

The Market Analysis fully addresses the key points related to the macro and micro implications of market competition, ACO payment incentives to the organization and how the Diabetes Treatment Center will impact economic efficiency.

59 (23.6%) - 67 (26.8%)

The Market Analysis lacks depth, breath, and clarity in critical thinking when addressing the key points related to the macro and micro implications of market competition, ACO payment incentives to the organization and how the Diabetes Treatment Center will impact economic efficiency.

0 (0%) - 58 (23.2%)

The Market Analysis does not address (zero points) or poorly addresses the key points related to the macro and micro implications of market competition, ACO payment incentives to the organization and how the Diabetes Treatment Center will impact economic efficiency.

Financial Analysis

78 (31.2%) - 85 (34%)

The Financial Analysis and Pro forma are correct and appropriately and accurately shows how the responses were determined.

68 (27.2%) - 77 (30.8%)

The Financial Analysis and Pro forma are correct, but fail to appropriately and accurately show how the responses were determined.

59 (23.6%) - 67 (26.8%)

Parts of the Financial Analysis and Pro forma are incorrect but appropriately show how the responses were determined.

0 (0%) - 58 (23.2%)

The Financial Analysis and Pro forma are not accurate (zero points) or are mostly inaccurate and fail to show how the responses were determined.

Writing

36 (14.4%) - 40 (16%)

The paper is well organized, uses scholarly tone, contains original writing and proper paraphrasing, follows APA style, contains very few or no writing and/or spelling errors, and is fully consistent with graduate level writing style.

32 (12.8%) - 35 (14%)

The paper is mostly consistent with graduate level writing style and may have some spelling, APA, and writing errors.

28 (11.2%) - 31 (12.4%)

The paper is somewhat consistent with graduate level writing style and may have some spelling, APA, and writing errors.

0 (0%) - 27 (10.8%)

The paper is well below graduate level writing style expectations for organization, scholarly tone, APA style, and writing, or shows heavy reliance on quoting.

Total Points: 250

Name: Wk11_Project_Rubric