nyanya - can you please do my homework Assignment 3

Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric. Points: 280 Assignment 3: Fraud Schemes and Fraud Investigations Criteria Unacceptable Below 70% F Fair 70-79% C Proficient 80-89% B Exemplary 90-100% A 1. Based on your research, assume that you are fraud investigator assigned to coordinate an investigation of the fraudster. Determine how you would implement this investigation without the fraudster’s knowledge. Provide support for your rationale.

Weight: 15% Did not submit or incompletely determined how you would implement this investigation without the fraudster’s knowledge, based on your research and assuming that you are fraud investigator assigned to coordinate an investigation of the fraudster. Did not submit or incompletely provided support for your rationale. Partially determined how you would implement this investigation without the fraudster’s knowledge, based on your research and assuming that you are fraud investigator assigned to coordinate an investigation of the fraudster. Partially provided support for your rationale. Satisfactorily determined how you would implement this investigation without the fraudster’s knowledge, based on your research and assuming that you are fraud investigator assigned to coordinate an investigation of the fraudster.

Satisfactorily provided support for your rationale. Thoroughly determined how you would implement this investigation without the fraudster’s knowledge, based on your research and assuming that you are fraud investigator assigned to coordinate an investigation of the fraudster.

Thoroughly provided support for your rationale. 2. Assuming you are the fraud investigator on this case, assess what types of surveillance and / or covert operations you would use to collect evidence related to the fraud. Analyze technological options for investigating fraud, indicating what you believe to be the most effective option.

Provide support for your rationale.

Weight: 15% Did not submit or incompletely assessed what types of surveillance and / or covert operations you would use to collect evidence related to the fraud, assuming you are the fraud investigator on this case. Did not submit or incompletely analyzed technological options for investigating fraud, indicating what you believe to be the most effective option. Did not submit or incompletely provided support for your rationale. Partially assessed what types of surveillance and / or covert operations you would use to collect evidence related to the fraud, assuming you are the fraud investigator on this case. Partially analyzed technological options for investigating fraud, indicating what you believe to be the most effective option. Partially provided support for your rationale. Satisfactorily assessed what types of surveillance and / or covert operations you would use to collect evidence related to the fraud, assuming you are the fraud investigator on this case. Satisfactorily analyzed technological options for investigating fraud, indicating what you believe to be the most effective option.

Satisfactorily provided support for your rationale. Thoroughly assessed what types of surveillance and / or covert operations you would use to collect evidence related to the fraud, assuming you are the fraud investigator on this case. Thoroughly analyzed technological options for investigating fraud, indicating what you believe to be the most effective option. Thoroughly provided support for your rationale. 3. During the investigation, assess the most significant red flags which would have been an indication of possible fraud needing corrective action by management.

Weight: 15% Did not submit or incompletely assessed the most significant red flags which would have been an indication of possible fraud needing corrective action by management. Partially assessed the most significant red flags which would have been an indication of possible fraud needing corrective action by management. Satisfactorily assessed the most significant red flags which would have been an indication of possible fraud needing corrective action by management. Thoroughly assessed the most significant red flags which would have been an indication of possible fraud needing corrective action by management. Page 1 of 2 8/ 8/ 2017 https://blackboard.strayer.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/ACC/571/1134/Week7 -1134/Week% ... 4. Based on your research, suggest key practices the fraud investigator could have used in conducting interviews with the fraudster and the company’s employees.

Assess the various interviews and interrogation questions available to you, and select the type of interview and interrogation questions that would have been most appropriate for this investigation.

Provide support for your rationale.

Weight: 20% Did not submit or incompletely suggested key practices the fraud investigator could have used in conducting interviews with the fraudster and the company’s employees, based on your research.

Did not submit or incompletely assessed the various interviews and interrogation questions available to you, and did not submit or incompletely selected the type of interview and interrogation questions that would have been most appropriate for this investigation. Did not submit or incompletely provided support for your rationale. Partially suggested key practices the fraud investigator could have used in conducting interviews with the fraudster and the company’s employees, based on your research.

Partially assessed the various interviews and interrogation questions available to you, and partially selected the type of interview and interrogation questions that would have been most appropriate for this investigation.

Partially provided support for your rationale. Satisfactorily suggested key practices the fraud investigator could have used in conducting interviews with the fraudster and the company’s employees, based on your research.

Satisfactorily assessed the various interviews and interrogation questions available to you, and satisfactorily selected the type of interview and interrogation questions that would have been most appropriate for this investigation.

Satisfactorily provided support for your rationale. Thoroughly suggested key practices the fraud investigator could have used in conducting interviews with the fraudster and the company’s employees, based on your research.

Thoroughly assessed the various interviews and interrogation questions available to you, and thoroughly selected the type of interview and interrogation questions that would have been most appropriate for this investigation.

Thoroughly provided support for your rationale. 5. Recommend a fraud prevention plan for this organization.

Determine the positive or negative consequences that this fraud prevention plan might have on employees’ morale and the public perception of the organization.

Provide support for your rationale.

Weight: 20% Did not submit or incompletely recommended a fraud prevention plan for this organization. Did not submit or incompletely determined the positive or negative consequences that this fraud prevention plan might have on employees’ morale and the public perception of the organization. Did not submit or incompletely provided support for your rationale. Partially recommended a fraud prevention plan for this organization.

Partially determined the positive or negative consequences that this fraud prevention plan might have on employees’ morale and the public perception of the organization.

Partially provided support for your rationale. Satisfactorily recommended a fraud prevention plan for this organization.

Satisfactorily determined the positive or negative consequences that this fraud prevention plan might have on employees’ morale and the public perception of the organization.

Satisfactorily provided support for your rationale. Thoroughly recommended a fraud prevention plan for this organization.

Thoroughly determined the positive or negative consequences that this fraud prevention plan might have on employees’ morale and the public perception of the organization.

Thoroughly provided support for your rationale. 6. 4 references Weight: 5% No references provided Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices. Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices. Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices. 7. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements Weight: 10% More than 6 errors present 5-6 errors present 3-4 errors present 0-2 errors present Page 2 of 2 8/ 8/ 2017 https://blackboard.strayer.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/ACC/571/1134/Week7 -1134/Week% ...