Case Study 2
Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic/organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.
Points: 100 | Case Study 2: Plain View, Open Fields, Abandonment, and Border Searches as They Relate to Search and Seizures | ||||
Criteria |
Unacceptable Below 60% F | Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D |
Fair 70-79% C |
Proficient 80-89% B |
Exemplary 90-100% A |
1. Identify the constitutional amendment that would govern Officer Jones’ actions. Weight: 35% | Did not submit or incompletely identified the constitutional amendment that would govern Officer Jones’ actions. | Insufficiently identified the constitutional amendment that would govern Officer Jones’ actions. | Partially identified the constitutional amendment that would govern Officer Jones’ actions. | Satisfactorily identified the constitutional amendment that would govern Officer Jones’ actions. | Thoroughly identified the constitutional amendment that would govern Officer Jones’ actions. |
2. Analyze the validity and constitutionality of Officer Jones’ actions. | Did not submit or incompletely analyzed the validity and constitutionality of Officer Jones’ actions. | Insufficiently analyzed the validity and constitutionality of Officer Jones’ actions. | Partially analyzed the validity and constitutionality of Officer Jones’ actions. | Satisfactorily analyzed the validity and constitutionality of Officer Jones’ actions. | Thoroughly analyzed the validity and constitutionality of Officer Jones’ actions. |
3. Discuss if Officer Jones’ actions were justified under the doctrines of plain view, abandonment, open fields, or border searches. Weight: 25% | Did not submit or incompletely discussed if Officer Jones’ actions were justified under the doctrines of plain view, abandonment, open fields, or border searches. | Insufficiently discussed if Officer Jones’ actions were justified under the doctrines of plain view, abandonment, open fields, or border searches. | Partially discussed if Officer Jones’ actions were justified under the doctrines of plain view, abandonment, open fields, or border searches. | Satisfactorily discussed if Officer Jones’ actions were justified under the doctrines of plain view, abandonment, open fields, or border searches. | Thoroughly discussed if Officer Jones’ actions were justified under the doctrines of plain view, abandonment, open fields, or border searches. |
4. 2 references Weight: 5% | No references provided | Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices. | Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices. | Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices. | Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices. |
5. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements Weight: 10% | More than 8 errors present | 7-8 errors present | 5-6 errors present | 3-4 errors present | 0-2 errors present |