PoL-SP09
- PSY 614 Module Nine Reaction Paper Rubric
Prompt: How have leaders wielded power in different ways? Provide at least two examples and cite sources appropriately; note whether or not each example promoted leadership effectiveness and how. Make sure to use the Module Nine resources to guide your answers. Craft a one- to two-page response to this prompt.
Format: Double-spaced Word document, 12-point Times New Roman font, 1-inch margins, APA format. Page length requirements: one to two pages, not including title page and references.
Instructor Feedback: Students can find their feedback in the Grade Center.
| Critical Elements | Exemplary | Proficient | Needs Improvement | Not Evident | Value | |
| Leaders and Power | Meets “Proficient” criteria and substantiates claims with scholarly research (27-30) | Identifies how leaders have wielded power using specific and relevant examples (24-26) | Does not sufficiently identify how leaders have wielded power using relevant examples (21-23) | Does not identify how leaders have wielded power (0-20) | 30 | |
| Analysis of Leader Effectiveness | Meets “Proficient” criteria and substantiates claims with scholarly research (27-30) | Makes and justifies claims about the effectiveness of leadership related to power using relevant examples (24-26) | Does not sufficiently make and justify claims about the effectiveness of leadership related to power using specific and relevant examples (21-23) | Does not include claims on leadership effectiveness (0-20) | 30 | |
| Organization | Applies highly effective pattern of organization around a logical flow (introduction, body, and conclusion) to effectively communicate the main idea of the paper (18-20) | Applies clear pattern of organization around a logical flow (introduction, body, and conclusion) to effectively communicate the main idea of the paper (16-17) | Does not sufficiently apply clear pattern of organization around a logical flow (introduction, body, and conclusion) to effectively communicate the main idea of the paper (14-15) | Organization of ideas is not evident (0-13) | 20 | |
| Articulation of Response | Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, and syntax and is presented in a professional and easy-to-read format (18-20) | Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or syntax (16-17) | Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or syntax that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas (14-15) | Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or syntax that prevent understanding of ideas (0-13) | 20 | |
| Earned Total Comments: | 100% | |||||
