Annotated Bibiliography on Health care legislation
HLTH 556
HLTH 556 FINAL ASSESSMENT BIBLIOGRAPHY INSTRUCTIONS
Create a bibliography of your Final Assessment resources. Your bibliography should include at least 10 scholarly, empirical, current sources (within the last 5 years) each 200 wordf that are directly related to your legislative proposal and supporting documentation. Be sure that you select a variety of respected sources that you can use in your paper. Format the bibliography in correct APA style.
I will upload the outline so that you can have a general idea of what to look for doing this research. Please no Plagiarism... It will be checked Thanks
Final Assessment Bibliography Grading Rubric
Student Name:
Criteria: | 9-10 points | 7-8 points | 5-6 points | 3-4 points | 1-2 points | 0 points | Points Earned |
Content | Sources are interesting and are all clearly related to the topic. | Sources are interesting and most are clearly related to your topic. | Sources cover the topic, but they are uninteresting and their relationship to the project is unclear | Some of the sources cover the topic, but the sources are uninspiring and their relationship to the project is unclear. | Few, if any, of the sources are related to the topic and they do not demonstrate the candidate’s interest in the topic. | Unclear if the sources are related or not. | |
Timeframe | Sources are all published within the correct timeframe for the topic. | Most, but not all, of the sources are published within the correct timeframe for the topic. | About half of the sources are published within the correct timeframe for the topic. | Some of the sources are published within the correct timeframe for the topic. | Few of the sources are published within the correct timeframe for the topic. | The timeframe is not relevant for the project topic. | |
Level | Contains a variety of research sources and they are all written at the appropriate level for this project’s purpose. | Contains a variety of research sources and most are written at the appropriate level for this project ’s purpose. | Contains less varied sources, but most are written at the appropriate level for this project ’s purpose. | Contains mostly one source type (i.e., Internet sites, books, etc.) and few are written at the appropriate level for this project ’s purpose. | Contains mostly one source type (i.e., Internet sites, books, etc.) and none are written at the appropriate level for this project ’s purpose. | Sources are inappropriate for this project’s purpose. | |
Authority | Sources have identifiable authors with relevant credentials. | Most sources have identifiable authors with relevant credentials. | Half of the sources have identifiable authors with relevant credentials.. | A few of the sources have identifiable authors with relevant credentials. | Not much is known about the authors of the sources. | No attempt is made to identify the authors and their credentials. | |
Conventions | At least 10 sources are formatted in the correct style. | At least 8 sources are formatted in the correct style with few errors. | At least 8 sources were cited, but some fail to meet the correct citation style. | At least 5 sources are cited, but in a different citation style than the one required. | Fewer than 5 sources are cited consistently, but do not follow a standard style. | Fewer than 5 sources are cited with no consistent citation style. | |
Total Points | /50 |
Instructor Comments:
Page 2 of 2