Formal Summative Assessment
Formal Summative Assessment
|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
| 100.0 %Criteria |
| |||||
| 20.0 %Formal Summative Assessment | Not addressed. | The formal summative assessment included does not align with the informational text, learning activity, reading standard, or learning objective. | The formal summative assessment included may not completely align with the informational text, learning activity, reading standard, or learning objective. | A formal summative assessment aligns with the informational text, learning activity, reading standard, and learning objective. | A formal summative assessment clearly and directly aligns with the informational text, learning activity, reading standard, and learning objective. | |
| 10.0 %Instructions and Answer Key or Rubric | Not addressed. | The instructions or answer key or rubric are presented incompletely or incorrectly. | The instructions or answer key or rubric could be developed more fully. | Clear instructions are included along with an answer key or rubric. | Clear and concise instructions are included along with a complete answer key or rubric. | |
| 15.0 %Rationale – What is Measured | Not addressed. | The description of the knowledge and skills to be measured is not presented thoroughly. | The description of the knowledge and skills to be measured could be presented more thoroughly. | A description of the knowledge and skills to be measured is included. | A complete description of all of the knowledge and skills to be measured is included. | |
| 10.0 %Rationale – Effectiveness | Not addressed. | The statement regarding the effectiveness of the assessment is not presented accurately. | The statement regarding the effectiveness of the assessment could be presented more accurately. | A statement regarding the effectiveness of the assessment is included. | An accurate description of the effectiveness of the assessment is included. | |
| 10.0 %Rationale – Why this Type was Chosen | Not addressed. | The statement regarding why this type of assessment was chosen is not fully developed. | The statement regarding why this type of assessment was chosen could be more fully developed. | A statement regarding why this type of assessment was chosen is included. | An insightful and well-thought out statement regarding why this type of assessment was chosen is included. | |
| 15.0 %Rationale – Appropriateness | Not addressed. | The statement regarding how this assessment is appropriate for the intended grade level of students in the profile is not presented well. | The statement regarding how this assessment is appropriate for the intended grade level of students in the profile requires further development. | A statement regarding how this assessment is appropriate for the intended grade level of students in the profile is included. | An accurate statement regarding how this assessment is appropriate for the intended grade level of students in the profile is included. | |
| 10.0 %Organization | Not addressed. | An attempt is made to organize the content, but the sequence is indiscernible. The ideas presented are compartmentalized and may not relate to each other. | The content could be organized better even though it provides the audience with a sense of the main idea. | The content is logically organized. The ideas presented relate to each other. The content provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea. | The content is well-organized and logical. There is a sequential progression of ideas that relate to each other. The content is presented as a cohesive unit and provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea. | |
| 10.0 %Mechanics (spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) | Not addressed. | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction are used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present but are not overly distracting to the reader; or inconsistent language or word choice is present; or sentence structure could be more varied. | Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. A variety of effective sentence structures are used, as well as some practice and content-related language. | Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging. | |
