Instructional Strategies

1
No submission 
0.00%

2
Insufficient
65.00%

3
Approaching
75.00%

4
Acceptable
85.00%

5
Target
100.00%

100.0 %Criteria

15.0 %Relevant Information (Grade Level, Informational Text, and Learning Objective)

Not addressed.

Much of the relevant information including grade level, informational text, and learning objective is missing or presented incorrectly.

Further relevant information including grade level, informational text, and learning objective is required.

Relevant information regarding including grade level, informational text, and learning objective is included.

All relevant information required on the template including grade level, informational text, and learning objective is clearly indicated.

15.0 %Grouping

Not addressed.

The grouping strategy is not appropriate for the intended students.

The grouping strategy is not completely adequate for the intended students.

The grouping strategy is adequate for the intended students.

The creative grouping strategy is appropriate for the intended students.

25.0 %I Do Section

Not addressed.

The script for more than one of the instructional strategies listed or the 4-5 DOK questions based on the informational text requires further development. Some aspects of this section are inappropriate for the intended students.

The script for at least one of the instructional strategies listed or the 4-5 DOK questions based on the informational text requires further development. Most aspects of this section are adequate for the intended students.

The I Do section is complete with scripts for each instructional strategy listed and includes 4-5 DOK questions based on the informational text. All aspects of this section are adequate for the intended students.

The I Do section is complete with succinct and well-crafted scripts for each instructional strategy listed and includes 4-5 DOK questions based on the informational text. All aspects of this section are appropriate for the intended students.

15.0 %Students Do Section

Not addressed.

The Students Do section is not presented well.

The Students Do section, though corresponds with the I Do section, requires further development.

The Students Do section is complete with entries that correspond with the I Do section.

The Students Do section contains succinct descriptions that describe exactly what students will do during the lesson and correspond with the I Do section.

15.0 %Differentiation

Not addressed.

Includes methods of differentiation that are not adequate for the intended grade level of students on the Class Profile.

Includes methods of differentiation that require further development or are not completely adequate for the intended grade level of students on the Class Profile.

Includes methods of differentiation that are adequate for the intended grade level of students on the Class Profile.

Includes methods of differentiation that are appropriate for the intended grade level of students on the Class Profile.

5.0 %Organization

Not addressed.

An attempt is made to organize the content, but the sequence is indiscernible. The ideas presented are compartmentalized and may not relate to each other.

The content could be organized better even though it provides the audience with a sense of the main idea.

The content is logically organized. The ideas presented relate to each other. The content provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea.

The content is well-organized and logical. There is a sequential progression of ideas that relate to each other. The content is presented as a cohesive unit and provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea.

10.0 %Mechanics (spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use)

Not addressed.

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction are used.

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present but are not overly distracting to the reader; or inconsistent language or word choice is present; or sentence structure could be more varied.

Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. A variety of effective sentence structures are used, as well as some practice and content-related language.

Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging.