Clinical Field Experience B: Observation – Strategies and Differentiation

1
1: No submission
0.00%

2
2: Insufficient
65.00%

3
3: Approaching
75.00%

4
4: Acceptable
85.00%

5
5: Target
100.00%

100.0 %Criteria

30.0 %Learning Strategies and Activities

Not addressed

The examples of learning strategies and activities used during the lesson are not presented well.

The examples of learning strategies and activities used during the lesson could be presented more clearly.

Includes examples of learning strategies and activities used during the lesson.

Includes well-formed examples of learning strategies and activities used during the lesson.

100.0 %Criteria

25.0 %Grouping

Not addressed

The statement regarding how students were grouped during the learning activities is not presented well.

The statement regarding how students were grouped during the learning activities requires further development.

A statement regarding how students were grouped during the learning activities is included.

An insightful statement regarding how students were grouped during the learning activities is included.

100.0 %Criteria

25.0 %Differentiation

Not addressed.

The statement regarding considerations for differentiation is inaccurate.

The statement regarding considerations for differentiation could be presented more accurately.

A statement regarding considerations for differentiation is included.

An accurate account of the considerations for differentiation is included.

100.0 %Criteria

10.0 %Organization

Not addressed.

An attempt is made to organize the content, but the sequence is indiscernible. The ideas presented are compartmentalized and may not relate to each other.

The content could be organized better even though it provides the audience with a sense of the main idea.

The content is logically organized. The ideas presented relate to each other. The content provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea.

The content is well-organized and logical. There is a sequential progression of ideas that relate to each other. The content is presented as a cohesive unit and provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea.

100.0 %Criteria

10.0 %Mechanics (spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use)

Not addressed.

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction are used.

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present but are not overly distracting to the reader; or inconsistent language or word choice is present; or sentence structure could be more varied.

Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. A variety of effective sentence structures are used, as well as some practice and content-related language.

Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging.