Case study 3

Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic/organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.

Points: 100	Case Study 3: Confessions and Admissions after a Request for a Lawyer
Criteria	Unacceptable Below 60% F	Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D	Fair 70-79% C	Proficient 80-89% B	Exemplary 90-100% A
1. Identify and discuss the constitutional amendments that would relate to this situation. Weight: 35%	Did not submit or incompletely identified and discussed the constitutional amendments that would relate to this situation.	Insufficiently identified and discussed the constitutional amendments that would relate to this situation.	Partially identified and discussed the constitutional amendments that would relate to this situation.	Satisfactorily identified and discussed the constitutional amendments that would relate to this situation.	Thoroughly identified and discussed the constitutional amendments that would relate to this situation.
2. Discuss how the Edwards rule is related to this situation. Weight: 25%	Did not submit or incompletely discussed how the Edwards rule is related to this situation.	Insufficiently discussed how the Edwards rule is related to this situation.	Partially discussed how the Edwards rule is related to this situation.	Satisfactorily discussed how the Edwards rule is related to this situation.	Thoroughly discussed how the Edwards rule is related to this situation.
3. In your opinion, determine if the suspect’s confession to the detective is admissible. Weight: 25%	Did not submit or incompletely determined if the suspect’s confession to the detective is admissible.	Insufficiently determined if the suspect’s confession to the detective is admissible.	Partially determined if the suspect’s confession to the detective is admissible.	Satisfactorily determined if the suspect’s confession to the detective is admissible.	Thoroughly determined if the suspect’s confession to the detective is admissible.
4. 2 references Weight: 5%	No references provided	Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices.	Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices.	Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.	Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.
5. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements Weight: 10%	More than 8 errors present	7-8 errors present	5-6 errors present	3-4 errors present	0-2 errors present

Bottom of Form