please follow my instructions laid out in the asginment

Question 1 Students will use the link below locate one recent examples of ethical failures listed on the following site: https://www.scu.edu/ethics/focus-areas/business-ethics/resources/facebook- and-our-fake-news-problem/ and provide substantive evaluations of these ethical failures in the above link provided. Note the template below must be used or included in paper. 25 RESEARCH ARTICLE CRITIQUE DATE: YOUR NAME: Theme/Title of your research proposal [ Place the overall theme/research question of your research here] COMPLETE APA REFERENCE For ARTICLE (in correct form): [Author, date, peer - reviewed journal article title, publication title] SUMMARY (not to exceed 50% of review): Look for the what, where, who, when, how and particularly the why of the article.

CRITICAL ANALYSIS: What were the strong points of the Journal Article? Timely, relevant, important, applicable?

Make sure to include the type of methodology used. Did the author’s conclusions appear to be supported by the data? Recommendations for future research? Weakne sses in data collection or analysis? Was method chosen appropriate? What would you have done differently? PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS/IMPLICATIONS: Answer the “So what?” question. References :

Make sure to cite using APA style! 26 Assignment Cover Sheet Course ADM - 545 Values & Ethics in Administration Title of Assignment Submitted by: Date of Submission: CERTIFICATION OF AUTHORSHIP: By including this cover sheet I certify that I am the author of this submittal and that any assistance I received in its preparation is fully acknowledged and disclosed. I have also cited any sources from which I used data, ideas, or words, either quoted directly or paraphrased. I also certify that this paper was prepared by me specificall y for this course only and was not previously submitted in any other course. I have read the P ACE Academic Disho nesty Policy regarding cheating and plagiarism and understand its consequences and penalties. Question 2. Students will go to Google scholor and find a most recent journal article critiques* on business ethics and values or ethics in business using the article evaluation rubic form below These critiques are intended to be cumulative in your understanding of the material and it is expected that as we progress through the material the evaluation will become more complete. A link to the article must be provided for instructor to read. APA fromat is required must not be less than two full page. NB. Teacher dont want direct quote use from article teacher wants what every quote use must be in own words and sited appropriately in APA format. 24 Rubric for Values & Ethics Forum Evaluation Criterion Excellent Very Good Good Competent Inadequate 1. Overall quality of the presentati on: preparation, clarity, structure, content . Truly exceptional:

well prepared, very clear, very well structured, compelling content Strong: prepared, clear, structured, interesting or useful content Satisfactory:

prepared, relatively clear, fair structure, somewhat interesting content Barely adequate:

somewhat clear, somewhat structured, adequate content Very weak:

demonstrating lac k of preparation, lack of clarity, lack of structure, and minimal content 2. Critique of video/chapter topics. Truly exceptional:

very responsive, incisive, informative Strong: responsive, direct, generally informative Satisfactory:

somewhat responsive, generally direct, somewhat informative Barely adequate:

weak or short responses, somewhat rambling, little information Very weak: not responsive, rambling, not informative Score: _________ Rubric for Values & Ethics in Administration Journal Article Critiques Criterion 5 4 3 2 0 - 1 1. Overall quality of the presentati on: preparation, clarity, structure, content , journal article used. Truly exceptional:

well prepared, very clear, very well structured, compelling content Strong: prepared, clear, structured, interesting or useful content Satisfactory:

prepared, relatively clear, fair structure, somewhat interesting content Barely adequ ate:

somewhat clear, somewhat structured, adequate content Very weak:

demonstrating lack of preparation, lack of clarity, lack of structure, and minimal content 2. Critique of journal article Truly exceptional:

very responsive, incisive, informative Strong: responsive, direct, generally informative Satisfactory:

somewhat responsive, generally direct, somewhat informative Barely adequate:

weak or short responses, somewhat rambling, little information Very weak: not responsive, rambling, not informat ive