Nursing assignment need to done task1 and task2 only

NUR250 – Medical Surgical 1 Semester 2, 2017 : Assessment 1 Marking Criteria

NUR2 50 Medical Surgical 1 : Assessment 1 Marking Criteria, S 2 201 7

1

Criteria Unsatisfactory Limited Satisfactory Good Excellent Task 2: Nursing care plan: Ability to interpret & address task ( 40) Ability to develop an individualised , patient focused, evidence -based nursing care plan for the case scenario addressing fundamental care needs. Identifies and explains :  Nursing problem  Related to  Goals of care  Nursing interventions  Rationales  Indicators the plan is working Demonstrates critical thi nking to make sound clinical decisions throughout the care plan. Demonstrates an understanding of the role and scope of the registered nurse.

0-9 Marks Poor interpretation of Task 2. Little if any ability to develop an individualised, evidence -based nursing care plan. Nursing problems are not stated or not relevant to the scenario. Nursing interventions are limited or do not meet the registered nurse scope of practice . Unsatisfactory rationales or explanations for nursing care and/or limited ability to explain or justify nursing actions. No or little ability to evaluate outcomes of care.

10-19 Marks

Demonstrates limited ability to develop an individualised, evidence -based nursing care plan . Nursing interventions may or may not meet the registered nurse scope of practice. Most, if not all, rationales demonstrate limited ability to explain or justify identified nursing actions. Limited ability to evaluate outc omes of care.

20-29 Marks Demonstrates basic ability to develop an individualised, evidence -based nursing care plan. Nursing interventions are within the registered nurse scope of practice . Most, if not all, rationales demonstrate satisfactory ability to explain or justify identified nursing actions. Basic ability to evaluate outcomes of care .

30-35 Marks

Demonstrates good ability to develop an individualised, evidence -based nursing care plan. Nursing interventions demonstrate a good understanding of the role and scope of the registered nurse. All rationales demonstrate a developing ability to explain or justify identified nursing actions. Developing ability to evaluate realistic and achievable outcomes for planned care.

35-40 Marks

Demonstrates h igh level ability to develop an individualised, evidence -based nursing care plan. Nursing interventions demonstrate a good understanding of the role and scope of the registered nurse. All are appropriately stated and relevant to scenario. All rationales demon strate high level ability to explain or justify identified nursing actions. High level ability to evaluate appropriate expected outcomes for planned care.

Ability to interpret & address other tasks (40) Demonstrated ability to identify

assessments , discuss medication

management responsibilities, identify

and discuss the deteriorating patient and

develop a succinct, comprehensive

handover using the ISBAR format

Task 1: (10) Task 3: (10): Task 4: (10)

Task 5: (10)]

0-9 Marks Poor interpretation of mo st if not

all, of the other assessment tasks.

Does not demonstrate safe

practice knowledge for

documentation, medication

management, patient deterioration

and handover.

10-19 Marks Limited interpretation of most, if not all, of the other assessment tasks . Demonstrates limited safe practice knowledge for documentation, medication management , patient deterioration and handover.

20-29 Marks Basic interpretation of the other assessment tasks. Identifies basic nursing actions and interventions. Demonstrates satisfactory safe practice knowledge for documentation, medication management , patient deterioration and handover.

30-35 Marks Good interpretation of the other assessment tasks. Demonstrates safe practice knowledge for documentation, medicati on management , patient deterioration and handover.

35-40 Marks Excellent interpretation of the other assessment tasks. Demonstrates excellent safe practice knowledge for documentation, medication management , patient deterioration and handover.

Academic Integrity 1: Evidence for practice (5) Demonstrated engagement with current, reli able evidence for practice. Minimum of 8 relevant journal articles cited that meet stated criteria. No more than 1 current edition textbook and 1 Australian Medicines textbook or eBooks used as a reference. Any other resources are current, appropriate and reliable.

0-1 Mark Demonstrates little if any engagement with current, reliable evidence for practice. 0 – 3 journal articles that meet stated criteria that may or may not be relevant. Numerous textbooks and/or inappropriate resources in reference list

2 Marks Demonstrates limited engagement with current, reliable evidence for practice. 4 - 7 journal ar ticles that meet stated criteria that may or may not be relevant. Textbooks are not current edition and/or 3 or more textbooks , Some inappropriate resources used in assignment

3 Marks Demonstrates a developing engagement with current, reliable evidence for practice. 8 or more journal articles that may or may not meet stated criteria or be reliable and/or relevant. No more than 2 current textbooks cited as a reference, occasional inappropriate resources in reference list.

4 Marks Demonstrates good engagement with current, reliable evidence for practice. 8 or more reliable and relevant journal articles that meet stated criteria. No more than 2 current edition textbooks cited as a reference, no inappropriate resources in reference list

5 Marks De monstrates high level engagement with current, reliable evidence for practice. 8 or more highly reliable and relevant journal articles that meet stated criteria. No more than 2 current edition textbook cited as a reference, no inappropriate resources in reference list. NUR250 – Medical Surgical 1 Semester 2, 2017 : Assessment 1 Marking Criteria

NUR2 50 Medical Surgical 1 : Assessment 1 Marking Criteria, S 2 201 7

2

Academic Integrity 2 (5) Demonstrated ability to adhere to academic and professional policies and standards when using the work of others. Thoughts and ideas well supported by correct and accurate in -text citations and complete and accurate reference list in CDU APA 6 th format. Direct quotes appropriately acknowledged

0-1 mark Demonstrates little if any ability to adhere to academic integrity policies and standards. No or limited in -text citations and/or missing or incomplete ref erence list and/or referencing details and/or referencing does not follow a consistent format. Numerous direct quotes poorly or not acknowledged. Academic integrity standards not met. May be investigated for breach of academic integrity or plagiarism

2 marks Demonstrates a limited ability to acknowledge the work of others. Some -text citations and/or incomplete reference list and/or inaccurate and/or incomplete referencing details and/or inconsistent referencing format. Some direct quotes poorly or not acknowledged. Academic integrity standards not met. May be counselled or investigated for breach of academic integrity or plagiarism.

3 marks Demonstrates a developing ability to acknowledge the work of others. Most ideas supported with appropriate in -text citations and there is a complete reference list. Some inconsistency, inaccuracy and/or incomplete details in CDU APA 6 th format. Most direct quotes appropriately acknowledged. Academic integrity policies and standards met at a basic level.

4 marks Demonstrates a good ability to acknowledge the work of others. All ideas supported with in -text citations and there is a complete reference list. Occasional errors in CDU APA 6th format. All direct quotes appropriately acknowledged. Academic integrity st andards met.

5 marks Demonstrates high level ability to acknowledge the work of others. All ideas supported with appropriate and accurate in -text citations and there is a complete and accurate reference list. No errors detected in CDU APA 6 th format. Acad emic integrity standards met at a high level.

Academic Literacy 1 - Written communication (5) Demonstrates appropriate level of written communication for nursing practice. Content flows logically, demonstrates appropriate professional language with no spelling or grammatical errors and no acronyms, abbreviations, nursing jargon, or diagrams as per assignment guidelines .

0-1 marks Does not demonstrate an appropriate level of written communication for nursing practice. Thoughts and ideas disorga nized, content does not flow in a coherent manner. Frequent spelling and grammatical errors and/or may or may not contain lists, abbreviations, diagrams, acronyms and/or nursing jargon. Requires significant development of academic literacy skills

2 marks Demonstrates a developing ability in written communication for nursing practice. Thoughts and ideas sometimes disorganized, content does not always flow in a coherent manner. Some grammatical and spelling errors and/or may or may not contain lists, abbre viations, diagrams, acronyms and/or nursing jargon. Requires some development of academic literacy skills

3 marks Demonstrates an appropriate level of written communication for nursing practice. Thoughts and ideas are generally organized with coherent flo w. Contains some grammatical and spelling errors and/or occasional lists, abbreviations, diagrams, acronyms and/or nursing jargon. Would benefit from some advice to further develop academic literacy skills

4 marks Demonstrates a developing sophistication of expression and writing that meets written communication standards for nursing practice and academic literacy. Content is well organised with coherent flow. Few if any grammatical and/or spelling errors and there are no lists, abbreviations, diagrams, acronyms and/or nursing jargon.

5 marks Meets written communication standards for nursing practice and academic literacy at a high level. Content is well organized with coherent flow. Assignment is free from grammatical and/or spelling errors and ther e are no lists, abbreviations, diagrams acronyms and/or nursing jargon

Academic Literacy 2 - Presentation (5) Submitted on required template as a word document. Font is either Arial, Times New Roman or Calibri size 11 or 12. Line spacing is 1.5. Within the stated word count. Dot points and table format only used for task 2.

0-1 marks Assignment is not on required template and/or is more than 20% under of over stated word count. Inconsistent or incorrect font or font size. Dot points and tables used where not appropriate.

2 marks Assignment is not on required template and/or is between 10 - 20% under or over stated word count. May have inconsistent or incorrect font or font size . May have dot points and tables where not appropriate.

3 marks Assignment is on required template and is within stated word count. May have inconsistent or incorrect font or font size. May have dot points and tables where not appropriate.

4 marks Assignment is on required template and is within stated word count. Correct font and font size. May have occasional dot points in tasks 1, 3, 4, or 5

5 marks Assignment is on required template and is within stated word count. Correct font and font size is consistent throughout assignment. No dot points or tables where not appropriate.