complete assigment

Rubic

Accomplished

Proficient

Needs Improvement

Problem

Points:

Points Range: 9 (9%) - 10 (10%)

Clinical problem is discussed with citations. Gap in the research literature is identified and described.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 1 (1%) - 8 (8%)

Significance of problem vague. Gap in the research literature is not well described. No citation given.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 0 (0%) - 0 (0%)

Problem or gap is not discussed.

Feedback:

Article # 1 Appraisal If the article is not included in the submission, 10 points per article will be deducted. If the study does not meet criteria outlined in the assignment instructions, 20 points will be deducted.

Points:

Points Range: 10 (10%) - 20 (20%)

Uses the PINCH Table to identify current studies and describe the elements presented in the study. Elements for each article include: author (1 point), study purpose (3 points), sample description including size and demographics (4 points), study design type (3 points), variables listed and identified by type (DV and or IV) (4 points), measurements of the variables (3 points), major study findings/results (2 points). Elements are described fully and any important notes are included. Article is included. There are 20 points allotted for each article.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 0 (0%) - 10 (10%)

Vague explanation of elements given. Missing article.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 0 (0%) - 0 (0%)

Study does not met the criteria for the assignment.

Feedback:

Article # 2 Appraisal If the article is not included in the submission, 10 points per article will be deducted. If the study does not meet criteria outlined in the assignment instructions, 20 points will be deducted.

Points:

Points Range: 11 (11%) - 20 (20%)

Uses the PINCH Table to identify current studies and describe the elements presented in the study. Elements for each article include: author (1 point), study purpose (3 points), sample description including size and demographics (4 points), study design type (3 points), variables listed and identified by type (DV and or IV) (4 points), measurements of the variables (3 points), major study findings/results (2 points). Elements are described fully and any important notes are included. Article is included. There are 20 points allotted for each article.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 0 (0%) - 10 (10%)

Vague explanation of elements given. Missing article.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 0 (0%) - 2 (2%)

Study does not met the criteria for the assignment.

Feedback:

Article # 3 Appraisal If the article is not included in the submission, 10 points per article will be deducted. If the study does not meet criteria outlined in the assignment instructions, 20 points will be deducted.

Points:

Points Range: 11 (11%) - 20 (20%)

Uses the PINCH Table to identify current studies and describe the elements presented in the study. Elements for each article include: author (1 point), study purpose (3 points), sample description including size and demographics (4 points), study design type (3 points), variables listed and identified by type (DV and or IV) (4 points), measurements of the variables (3 points), major study findings/results (2 points). Elements are described fully and any important notes are included. Article is included. There are 20 points allotted for each article.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 0 (0%) - 10 (10%)

Vague explanation of elements given. Missing article.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 0 (0%) - 2 (2%)

Study does not met the criteria for the assignment.

Feedback:

Article # 4 Appraisal If the article is not included in the submission, 10 points per article will be deducted. If the study does not meet criteria outlined in the assignment instructions, 20 points will be deducted.

Points:

Points Range: 11 (11%) - 20 (20%)

Uses the PINCH Table to identify current studies and describe the elements presented in the study. Elements for each article include: author (1 point), study purpose (3 points), sample description including size and demographics (4 points), study design type (3 points), variables listed and identified by type (DV and or IV) (4 points), measurements of the variables (3 points), major study findings/results (2 points). Elements are described fully and any important notes are included. Article is included. There are 20 points allotted for each article.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 0 (0%) - 10 (10%)

Vague explanation of elements given. Missing article.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 0 (0%) - 0 (0%)

Study does not met the criteria for the assignment.

Feedback:

Formatting

Points:

Points Range: 9 (9%) - 10 (10%)

Pinch Table organized and readable. Spelling counts. Reference page included with no citation errors.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 3 (3%) - 8 (8%)

Pinch Table disorganized with errors. -1 point off for each error on formatting and basic readability.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 0 (0%) - 2 (2%)

More than 7 errors

Feedback:

Show Descriptions Show Feedback

Problem--

Levels of Achievement:

Accomplished 9 (9%) - 10 (10%)

Clinical problem is discussed with citations. Gap in the research literature is identified and described.

Proficient 1 (1%) - 8 (8%)

Significance of problem vague. Gap in the research literature is not well described. No citation given.

Needs Improvement 0 (0%) - 0 (0%)

Problem or gap is not discussed.

Feedback:

Article # 1 Appraisal If the article is not included in the submission, 10 points per article will be deducted. If the study does not meet criteria outlined in the assignment instructions, 20 points will be deducted.--

Levels of Achievement:

Accomplished 10 (10%) - 20 (20%)

Uses the PINCH Table to identify current studies and describe the elements presented in the study. Elements for each article include: author (1 point), study purpose (3 points), sample description including size and demographics (4 points), study design type (3 points), variables listed and identified by type (DV and or IV) (4 points), measurements of the variables (3 points), major study findings/results (2 points). Elements are described fully and any important notes are included. Article is included. There are 20 points allotted for each article.

Proficient 0 (0%) - 10 (10%)

Vague explanation of elements given. Missing article.

Needs Improvement 0 (0%) - 0 (0%)

Study does not met the criteria for the assignment.

Feedback:

Article # 2 Appraisal If the article is not included in the submission, 10 points per article will be deducted. If the study does not meet criteria outlined in the assignment instructions, 20 points will be deducted.--

Levels of Achievement:

Accomplished 11 (11%) - 20 (20%)

Uses the PINCH Table to identify current studies and describe the elements presented in the study. Elements for each article include: author (1 point), study purpose (3 points), sample description including size and demographics (4 points), study design type (3 points), variables listed and identified by type (DV and or IV) (4 points), measurements of the variables (3 points), major study findings/results (2 points). Elements are described fully and any important notes are included. Article is included. There are 20 points allotted for each article.

Proficient 0 (0%) - 10 (10%)

Vague explanation of elements given. Missing article.

Needs Improvement 0 (0%) - 2 (2%)

Study does not met the criteria for the assignment.

Feedback:

Article # 3 Appraisal If the article is not included in the submission, 10 points per article will be deducted. If the study does not meet criteria outlined in the assignment instructions, 20 points will be deducted.--

Levels of Achievement:

Accomplished 11 (11%) - 20 (20%)

Uses the PINCH Table to identify current studies and describe the elements presented in the study. Elements for each article include: author (1 point), study purpose (3 points), sample description including size and demographics (4 points), study design type (3 points), variables listed and identified by type (DV and or IV) (4 points), measurements of the variables (3 points), major study findings/results (2 points). Elements are described fully and any important notes are included. Article is included. There are 20 points allotted for each article.

Proficient 0 (0%) - 10 (10%)

Vague explanation of elements given. Missing article.

Needs Improvement 0 (0%) - 2 (2%)

Study does not met the criteria for the assignment.

Feedback:

Article # 4 Appraisal If the article is not included in the submission, 10 points per article will be deducted. If the study does not meet criteria outlined in the assignment instructions, 20 points will be deducted.--

Levels of Achievement:

Accomplished 11 (11%) - 20 (20%)

Uses the PINCH Table to identify current studies and describe the elements presented in the study. Elements for each article include: author (1 point), study purpose (3 points), sample description including size and demographics (4 points), study design type (3 points), variables listed and identified by type (DV and or IV) (4 points), measurements of the variables (3 points), major study findings/results (2 points). Elements are described fully and any important notes are included. Article is included. There are 20 points allotted for each article.

Proficient 0 (0%) - 10 (10%)

Vague explanation of elements given. Missing article.

Needs Improvement 0 (0%) - 0 (0%)

Study does not met the criteria for the assignment.

Feedback:

Formatting--

Levels of Achievement:

Accomplished 9 (9%) - 10 (10%)

Pinch Table organized and readable. Spelling counts. Reference page included with no citation errors.

Proficient 3 (3%) - 8 (8%)

Pinch Table disorganized with errors. -1 point off for each error on formatting and basic readability.

Needs Improvement 0 (0%) - 2 (2%)

More than 7 errors

Feedback:

Name:Review of Literature, Pinch Table

Description:In this assignment you will create Pinch Table of study articles as part of a Review of Literature (Chapter 3 and 6). following the guidelines in Grove, Burns, and Gray (2013) Chapter 6 & 18.