evaluating lesson

Evaluating Lesson Plans

	1 1: No submission 0.00%	2 2: Insufficient 65.00%	3 3: Approaching 75.00%	4 4: Acceptable 85.00%	5 5: Target 100.00%
100.0 %Criteria
10.0 %Thoroughness	Not addressed.	The statement regarding the thoroughness of the lesson plan components is not presented well.	The statement regarding the thoroughness of the lesson plan components could be more fully developed.	A statement regarding the thoroughness of the lesson plan components is included.	A complete description regarding the thoroughness of the lesson plan components is included.
100.0 %Criteria
20.0 %Alignment	Not addressed.	The statement regarding the alignment between the standard, learning objectives, learning and teaching activities, and assessments is not presented well.	The statement regarding the alignment between the standard, learning objectives, learning and teaching activities, and assessments could be more fully developed.	A statement regarding the alignment between the standard, learning objectives, learning and teaching activities, and assessments is included.	A well-informed statement regarding the alignment between the standard, learning objectives, learning and teaching activities, and assessments is accurately provided.
100.0 %Criteria
15.0 %Real-World Relevance	Not addressed.	The statement regarding the real-world relevance of the learning and teaching activities is not presented well.	The statement regarding the real-world relevance of the learning and teaching activities could be more fully developed.	A statement regarding the real-world relevance of the learning and teaching activities is included.	A well-crafted statement regarding the real-world relevance of the learning and teaching activities is included.
100.0 %Criteria
15.0 %Evidence or Artifacts of Learning	Not addressed.	The statement regarding how the teacher would know that the students have mastered the learning objectives is not presented well.	The statement regarding how the teacher would know that the students have mastered the learning objectives requires further development.	A statement regarding how the teacher would know that the students have mastered the learning objectives is included.	A thorough statement regarding how the teacher would know that the students have mastered the learning objectives is included. Examples are provided.
100.0 %Criteria
10.0 %Engagement Level	Not addressed.	The statement regarding the expected engagement level is not presented well.	The statement regarding the expected engagement level requires further development.	A statement regarding the expected engagement level is included.	An insightful statement regarding the expected engagement level is included.
100.0 %Criteria
10.0 %URL Provided	Not addressed.	The URL or example provided does not match the evaluation.	The URL or example is not prominently included within the submission.	Includes the URL or example of the lesson plan that is evaluated.	Clearly includes the URL or example of the lesson plan that is evaluated.
100.0 %Criteria
10.0 %Organization	Not addressed.	An attempt is made to organize the content, but the sequence is indiscernible. The ideas presented are compartmentalized and may not relate to each other.	The content could be organized better even though it provides the audience with a sense of the main idea.	The content is logically organized. The ideas presented relate to each other. The content provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea.	The content is well-organized and logical. There is a sequential progression of ideas that relate to each other. The content is presented as a cohesive unit and provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea.
100.0 %Criteria
10.0 %Mechanics (spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use)	Not addressed.	Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction are used.	Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present but are not overly distracting to the reader; or inconsistent language or word choice is present; or sentence structure could be more varied.	Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. A variety of effective sentence structures are used, as well as some practice and content-related language.	Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging.
100 %Total Weightage