for the writer Finance guru only
Semester 2 2017
ACCT5000 Intermediate Management Accounting
Marking Guide for Reports
Student Name: ________________________________________________________________ Student No: ______________________________
Use this sheet to prepare your report. Your tutor will use it to provide you with feedback and marks.
Below Expectations 0-4.9 | Meets Expectations 5-5.9 | Meets Expectations 6-6.9 | Exceed Expectations 7-7.9 | Exceed Expectations 8-10 | |
Introduction (Max: 10) | The introduction does not identify the management accounting issues addressed and the purpose of the report is not communicated. | The introduction provides insufficient information on the management accounting issues and the purpose of the report is mentioned but not clearly expressed. | The introduction provides some information on the management accounting issues and the purpose of the report is briefly stated. | The introduction provides sufficient information on the management accounting issues and the purpose of the report is clearly stated. | The introduction provides comprehensive information on the management accounting issues and the purpose of the report is clearly stated. |
Identification of issues (DK1) (Max:10) | • Inadequately identifies and analyses issues and problems. | • Identifies and analyses the most significant issues and problems. | • Identifies and analyses issues and problems with adequate reference to the interrelationships among the issues. | • Identifies and analyses complex interrelationships among the issues and problems. | • Identifies and analyses in-depth complex interrelationships among the issues and problems. |
Application of discipline knowledge (DK2) (Max:10) | • Discipline knowledge is poorly applied resulting in the management accounting issues and problems being not/unsatisfactorily resolved. | • Discipline knowledge is poorly applied resulting in the management accounting issues and problems being incompletely resolved. | • Applies appropriate management accounting practices, principles and theories to problems and issues. | • Applies appropriate management accounting practices, principles and theories to issues and problems with satisfactory resolution. | • Applies appropriate management accounting practices, principles and theories to issues and problems with superior rationale, and resolution. |
Below Expectations 0-4.9 | Meets Expectations 5-5.9 | Meets Expectations 6-6.9 | Exceed Expectations 7-7.9 | Exceed Expectations 8-10 | |
Conclusions and recommendations (DK3) (Max:10) | • The conclusions and recommendations are vague or non-existent. • Conclusions are not logically supported by the evidence and process of analysis. | • The conclusions and recommendations are clear and relevant. • Few conclusions are generally supported by the evidence and the process of analysis. | • The conclusions and recommendations are sound, clear and relevant. • Some conclusions are generally supported by the evidence and the process of analysis. | • The conclusions and recommendations are relevant, significant and organized. • Most conclusions are logically supported by the evidence and/or the process of analysis. | • The conclusions and recommendations are robust, comprehensive, relevant, significant and organized. • All conclusions are logically supported by the evidence and the process of analysis. |
Formatting: Presentation of submission, use of appropriate report structure and the Chicago Referencing style is used. (Max:10) | Presentation of submission is not structured as a report and does not meet submission requirements. Referencing is missing or significantly inconsistent with the Chicago referencing style. | Presentation partially meets submission requirements; report structure partially met; but referencing is inconsistent with the Chicago referencing style. | Presentation of submission meets most requirements and the structure of a report. Referencing is consistent with the Chicago referencing style. | Presentation of submission meets all requirements and report is structured well. Referencing is consistent with the Chicago referencing style. | Submission is professionally presented and structured as a report. Referencing is consistent with the Chicago referencing style. |
Total marks: /50
Comments:
(The mark out of 50 will be weighted to 10% of the total unit mark i.e. REPORT MARK/50* 10)
Page 3 of 3