Annotated Bibliography
0
Annotated Bibliography: Topic (Chosen from the list provided)
[Name]
Annotated Bibliography: Topic (Chosen from the list provided)
[APA formatted reference for source (list in alphabetical order) using a hanging indent]
[Underneath the reference, give a summary of the article then an analysis:
Summary of article: 1-2 paragraphs that describe the following information in your own words
in paragraph format (not bullet points).
Why the article was written?
What are the major points of the article?
If the article was a study, describe:
o The methods used in the research: Include the participants, how the research question(s) was tested or measured (e.g. survey, interview, formal testing...)
o The results of the study: What did the researchers find out?
o The conclusions: What did the researchers conclude from the study? What were the limitations of the research?
NOTE: The article doesn’t need to be cited in the body of the annotated bibliography because it is referenced in the beginning of the review. For any other sources used (e.g. the text) you would cite as you normally do and list them in the reference section. [Analysis of the article: 1-2 paragraphs describing the following: Whether or not the points made by the author are logical and supported by evidence and whether the author demonstrates any bias in presenting the arguments. Were other arguments or possibilities considered? Are the author’s conclusions supported? Do they fit with your understanding of the topic and your textbook's description (cite the textbook and any other sources you use for analyzing your article – include any additional sources you cite as part of your analysis in your reference list)? Why or why not (provide support for your opinion)?]
Example of formatting:
Boonstra, A., & Broekhuis, M. (2010). Barriers to the acceptance of electronic medical records
by physicians from systematic review to taxonomy and interventions. BMC Health
Services Research, 10(1), 231-248. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-10-231
Authors conducted a systematic review of research papers between 1998 and
2009 that examined physician perceptions of barriers to implementation of
electronic medical records. An examination of 1671 articles....
DeVore, S. D., & Figlioli, K. (2010). Lessons Premier hospitals learned about implementing
electronic health records. Health Affairs, 29(4), 664-667. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0250
Premier healthcare alliance is a network of 2300 non-profit hospitals and 63,000
outpatient facilities in the United States. This paper summarized lessons learned
from reviewing implementation practices within their system....
References
List any references you cited in your analyses of your chosen sources. DO NOT list the references for the articles you chose as you already referenced them in your annotated bibliography.
