Annotated Bibliography

Assignment Annotated Bibliography

Due Date: Oct 11, 2017 5:00 PM Max Points: 150
Details:

The purpose of this assignment is to be able to actively search for relevant research related to your PICOT topic and present it in a formal annotated bibliography.

General Requirements:

Refer to the resource, "Preparing Annotated Bibliographies," located in the Student Success Center, for additional guidance on completing this assignment in the appropriate style.
Doctoral learners are required to use Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.

Directions:

As you search the library for scholarly research, limit your search to identify empirical articles. You can use the "Empirical Research Checklist" to help with this determination. Upon finding an empirical study, assess the validity of the conclusion by determining if the conclusion answers your proposed research question and if the methodology is appropriate.

Using the "Empirical Research Checklist" and your knowledge of finding empirical research articles, locate six articles directly related to your proposed PICOT question. You may use the three you used for the assignment in Topic 4.

Write an annotation for each of the six articles that include a concise summary in your own words and the correct APA citation for each article.

Top of Form

Please Note: Assignment will not be submitted to the faculty member until the "Submit" button under "Final Submission" is clicked.

HERE IS MY PICOT TOPIC:

What is the Role of The Nurse in Assessing Violence Risk in Psychiatric inpatient?

The Role of the

Empirical Research Articles for you to work with

1. Assessing Violence Risk in Psychiatric Inpatients: Useful Tools

July 01, 2007 | Geriatric Psychiatry, Psychiatric Emergencies, Forensic Psychiatry, Trama And Violence, Addiction

By John Kennedy, MD, Scott Bresler, PhD, Anthony Whitaker, MD, JD, and Brian Masterson, MD

Background

Psychiatrists who work in inpatient units are faced with daily decisions about predicting which patients will be violent, both in the hospital and after discharge. These decisions are often made using unstructured clinical judgment based on the clinician's experience and knowledge of the literature. How long such judgment stays the standard of care remains to be seen, because psychiatric researchers have produced a number of assessment and management tools to improve the accuracy and use of violence risk assessment. This article briefly outlines 3 tools: the Brøset Violence Checklist (BVC), the Classification of Violence Risk (COVR), and the Historical Clinical Risk-20 (HCR-20).

2. Violence risk prediction

Clinical and actuarial measures and the role of the Psychopathy Checklist

MAIREAD DOLAN, MICHAEL DOYLE

The British Journal of Psychiatry Oct 2000, 177 (4) 303-311; DOI: 10.1192/bjp.177.4.303

3.Prevalence and Risk Factors of Violence by Psychiatric Acute Inpatients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Laura Iozzino, Clarissa Ferrari,Matthew Large, Olav Nielssen, Giovanni de Girolamo

Published: June 10, 2015https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128536

4. Clinical Decision-making About Inpatient Violence Risk at Admission to a Public-Sector Acute Psychiatric Hospital Virginia M. Newton, Eric B. Elbogen, Carrie L. Brown, Jennifer Snyder and Ann Louise Barrick Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online April 2012, 40 (2) 206-214;

5. Resource Document on Psychiatric Violence Risk Assessment

Alec Buchanan, M.D., Ph.D. [chair] Renee Binder, M.D. Michael Norko, M.D. Marvin Swartz, M.D. Approved by the Joint Reference Committee, October 2011

6.Assessment and Monitoring Toolkit - American Psychiatric ...

https://www.apna.org/i4a/pages/index.cfm?pageid=6271

The American Psychiatric Nurses Association Council ... the author describes nurses role in helping the ... Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in ...

Top of Form

Annotated Bibliography

	1 Unsatisfactory 0.00%	2 Less than Satisfactory 74.00%	3 Satisfactory 79.00%	4 Good 87.00%	5 Excellent 100.00%
100.0 %Content
20.0 %Articles	Articles are not included.	Articles are incomplete or incorrect and do not support the PICOT questions.	Articles are included, some of which support the PICOT question.	Articles are included and support the PICOT question.	Articles are extensive and provide substantial support to the PICOT question.
50.0 %Annotated Bibliographies (Citation and summary for each article)	Annotated bibliography entries are not included.	Annotated bibliography entries are incomplete or incorrect.	Annotated bibliography entries are partially complete and correct.	Annotated bibliography entries are mostly complete and correct.	Annotated bibliography entries are complete and correct.
2.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose	Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.	Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.	Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose	Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.	Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear
2.0 %Argument Logic and Construction	Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.	Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.	Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.	Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative	Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative
6.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)	Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.	Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.	Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.	Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.	Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
10.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)	Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.	Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.	Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.	Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.	All format elements are correct.
10.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)	Sources are not documented.	Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.	Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.	Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.	Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
100 %Total Weightage

Bottom of Form

An APA-formatted annotated bibliography containing a minimum of five sources.
Include four scholarly articles, scholarly books, or chapters from scholarly books
Include one primary source document.
Each item in the annotated bibliography should include the following information:
Name of the source, including the complete bibliographic citation in proper APA format.
At least a three-sentence summary of the source, including why you believe it is a scholarly (for an article, book, or chapter) or a primary source and how you will use this source for your project.