I would like to do my project on Fall Prevention in the Medical Surgical Setting The purpose of this assignment is to draft an appropriate and effective PICOT question that can be related to your DNP

I would like to do my project on Fall Prevention in the Medical Surgical Setting

The purpose of this assignment is to draft an appropriate and effective PICOT question that can be related to your DNP project. Keep in mind your project will continue to evolve and take more specific shape as you move through your program. That is expected. It is important to begin with a workable PICOT question in mind so that you start off on the right track and can continue to refine your area in subsequent courses.

Consider an advanced practice nursing care problem or issue related to your intended DPI Project. Conduct a search in the GCU Library using CINAHL, The Cochrane Library, the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI), OVID, or Sage Research Methods databases to find appropriate empirical resources regarding applicable nursing intervention research.

General Requirements:

  • Doctoral learners are required to use Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

  • This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

  • You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.

  • Review the "PICOT Decision Pathway" and "PICOT Selection Guidelines" resources.

Directions:

  1. Utilizing your feedback you have received on your draft PICOT question from Topic 2 DQ1, create a draft PICOT question specifically related to your project. This PICOT will be revised and in Topic 8 will be submitted for approval by the college.

  2. Use the “PICOT Decision Pathway” to determine if your PICOT question is appropriate and can be supported with substantial research.

  3. Using the “PICOT Question Template”, formulate an evidence-based practice (EBP) question that pertains to your project focus.

  4. In addition to your evidence-based practice PICOT question, prepare a brief abstract about your topic. Include a rationale for why you have selected this topic and why you believe it is in line with the PICOT selection guidelines. If you have selected a route that advises caution on the “PICOT Decision Pathway” explain how you think you might mitigate complications that could occur to ensure you are able to successfully accomplish your project in a timely manner.

Apply Rubrics

Evidence-Based PICOT Question 

 

1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%

2
Less than Satisfactory
74.00%

3
Satisfactory
79.00%

4
Good
87.00%

5
Excellent
100.00%

100.0 %Content

 

12.0 %Population

A description of population being assessed is not included.

A description of population being assessed is incomplete or incorrect.

A description of population being assessed is included but lacks a link to direct practice improvements that could be measured through patient and practice outcomes.

A description of population being assessed is complete and includes a direct link to practice improvements that can be measured through patient and practice outcomes.

A description of population being assessed can be linked to direct practice improvements and is extremely thorough with substantial supporting evidence.

12.0 %Intervention

A description of the intervention is not included.

A description of the intervention is incomplete or incorrect.

A description of the intervention is included but lacks a sufficient amount of evidence.

A description of the intervention is complete and includes a sufficient amount of evidence and is supported by literature.

A description of the intervention is extremely thorough with substantial evidence and supporting literature.

12.0 %Comparison

A description of the comparison information is not included.

A description of the comparison information is incomplete or incorrect.

A description of the comparison information is included but lacks evidence and measurable outcomes.

A description of the comparison information is complete and includes a sufficient amount of evidence and measurable outcomes.

A description of the comparison information is extremely thorough with substantial evidence and measurable outcomes.

12.0 %Outcome

A description of the outcome is not included.

A description of the outcomes is incomplete or incorrect.

A description of the outcome is included but lacks evidence.

A description of the outcome is complete and includes a sufficient amount of evidence

A description of the outcome is extremely thorough with substantial evidence.

12.0 %Timeline

A description of the timeline is not included.

A description of the timeline is incomplete or incorrect.

A description of the timeline is included but lacks evidence.

A description of the timelines is complete and includes a sufficient amount of evidence.

A description of the timeline is extremely thorough with substantial evidence.

15.0 %Rationale

A rationale for the selected topic is not included.

A rationale for the selected topic is incomplete or incorrect.

A rationale for the selected topic is included but lacks evidence.

A rationale for the selected topic is complete and includes a sufficient amount of evidence.

A rationale for the selected topic is extremely thorough with substantial evidence.

5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present.

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

10.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.

Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style

All format elements are correct.

10.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

Sources are not documented.

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

100 %Total Weightage