To prepare for writing your paper, you will seek out Seven scholarly sources and create an annotated bibliography. (Your research paper should only have 7-9 references.) Each entry should consist of t

ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY Alvarez, J . (1995). In the time of the b utterflies. New York: Plume Books. As you begin the narrative, you would start off with the summary . What was the central purpose of the study or article? What was the central research question or hypothesis or what substantiv e question did the author wish to address? Summarize —in your own words —the major results/findings of the study and the author’s interpretation of these findings/results. You would continue the narrative by adding an assessment . What about this source makes it a valid and scholarly source? Finally, you would use the remaining section to discuss your source’s usefulness. Discuss how the findings relate —directly and indirectly —to what you want to address in your final paper. Do these findings and conclusions s eem reasonable to you? Do you have a different interpretation of the findings or approach the topic from a different theoretical standpoint than the author?

Each narrative should be 150 -175 words —just about this size paragraph. Grice, H. (2004). Artistic creativity, form, and fictional experimentation in Filipina American fiction. MELUS , 29(1), 24 -35. Retrieved from ProQuest database . As you begin the narrative, you would start off with the summary . What was the central purpose of the study or article? What was the central research questi on or hypothesis or what substantive question did the author wish to address? Summarize —in your own words —the major results/findings of the study and the author’s interpretation of these findings/results. You would continue the narrative by adding an asses sment . What about this source makes it a valid and scholarly source? Finally, you would use the remaining section to discuss your source’s usefulness. Discuss how the findings relate —directly and indirectly —to what you want to address in your final paper. Do these findings and conclusions seem reasonable to you? Do you have a different interpretation of the findings or approach the topic from a different theoretical standpoint than the author?

Each narrative should be 150 -175 words —just about this size para graph. Morrison, T. (1993). Jazz. New York: Plume Books. As you begin the narrative, you would start off with the summary . What was the central purpose of the study or article? What was the central research question or hypothesis or what substantive ques tion did the author wish to address? Summarize —in your own words —the major results/findings of the study and the author’s interpretation of these findings/results. You would continue the narrative by adding an assessment . What about this source makes it a valid and scholarly source? Finally, you would use the remaining section to discuss your source’s usefulness. Discuss how the findings relate —directly and indirectly —to what you want to address in your final paper. Do these findings and conclusions seem re asonable to you? Do you have a different interpretation of the Commented [AMF1]: Notice that this reference entry uses double spacing. However, the narrative portion uses single spacing. Commented [AMF2]: If you obtain an article from a n online library database: 1.If you have a DOI, provide that number. 2. If no DOI exists, but you have a direct link , provide the link. Please note that links to online libraries are n ot direct. They require a special sig n-on, which yo ur reader most likely will not have 3. If you do not have a direct link, use this format: Retrieved from ProQuest database. (You will have to change the name of the database as needed.) findings or approach the topic from a different theoretical standpoint than the author?

Each narrative should be 150 -175 words —just about this size paragraph. Nguyen, K . (2002). The t apestries . New York: Little Brown and Company. As you begin the narrative, you would start off with the summary . What was the central purpose of the study or article? What was the central research question or hypothesis or what substantive question did the author wish to address? Summarize —in your own words —the major results/findings of the study and the author’s interpretation of these findings/results. You would continue the narrative by adding an assessment . What about this source makes it a vali d and scholarly source? Finally, you would use the remaining section to discuss your source’s usefulness. Discuss how the findings relate —directly and indirectly —to what you want to address in your final paper. Do these findings and conclusions seem reasonable to you? Do you have a different interpretation of the findings or approach the topic from a different theoretical standpoint than the author? Each narrative should be 150 -175 words —just about this size paragraph. Stern, R. G. (1997). A few things American fiction says. Southwest Review . 82, 243 -54. Retrieved from ProQuest database. As you begin the narrative, you would start off with the summary . What was the central purpose of the study or article? What was the central research question or hypothesis or what substantive question did the author wish to address? Summarize —in your own words —the major results/findings of the study and the author’s interpretation of these findings/results. You wo uld continue the narrative by adding an assessment . What about this source makes it a valid and scholarly source? Finally, you would use the remaining section to discuss your source’s usefulness. Discuss how the findings relate —directly and indirectly —to w hat you want to address in your final paper. Do these findings and conclusions seem reasonable to you? Do you have a different interpretation of the findings or approach the topic from a different theoretical standpoint than the author?

Each narrative shou ld be 150 -175 words —just about this size paragraph.