Need help! Please read Instructions! Please no plagiarism

Final Written Assignment: Persuasive Essay Due Week 9 and worth 215 points Instructions:

It’s time to finalize your persuasive essay! You should feel proud of everything you’ve accomplished so far. You’ve developed your ideas, identified counter perspectives, gathered credible research, and drafted your essay. Now you will use feedback from your instructor to review, revise, and edit your draft to ensure that you are submitting your best work.

You’ll want to deliver a polished essay that meets all the project requirements and effectively persuades your reader. Follow the steps below to get started. ASSIGNMENT4 Step 1 Revision Revision is about removing, adding, and refining content to improve clarity, idea development, flow, and the overall persuasiveness of your communication.

Here are some questions to ask yourself that will help ensure you are submitting your best work.

Effectiveness of Persuasive Position Logic: Have you fully explained the rationale? Did you provide enough background information, define key terms, build from one idea to the next?

Credibility: Did you build credibility through citing sources and using a voice (personality), tone (mood), and appropriate words for your topic and audience?

Emotion: How did you appeal to the emotional side of your audience?

(e.g., voice (personality), tone (mood), vivid descriptions, and/or personal stories) Balance: Do you hook your audience in the first paragraph? Do your appeals work together throughout to create a powerfully persuasive c ommunication? Do you include a call to action in the last paragraph?

Clarity of Ideas Have you fully explained your ideas?

Do you build logically from one point to the next?

Is your communication clear?

Is it straightforward and easy to understand?

Do your ideas flow smoothly from one to the next? Organization and Structure Introduction/Thesis: Does your thesis statement tell the reader what your essay is about? Does it communicate your position?

Background Information: Did you provide relevant background information as necessary?

Body Paragraphs: Do you provide an appropriate amount of information, analysis, and support?

Counter Perspective(s): Did you include one to three counter perspectives? Do you fully explain why you’re addressing each counter perspective? Does the counter perspective have flaws or weak evidence that strengthens your argument?

Conclusion: Do you provide a summary, rephrase your thesis, and leave a lasting impression?

Step 2 Editing As this is your final essay, you should pay close attention to grammar, mechanics, punctuation, and formatting. This will ensure that your meaning is clear. You don’t want to distract your audience or negatively impact your credibility with small mistakes!

Did you follow APA guidelines?

Cover page, page numbers, double-spaced, 1” margins, headers, indented paragraphs, and 12-point Times New Roman font.

In-Text Citations (Author’s last name, date) For example: (Wielding, 2017).

References All references are in alphabetical order with hanging indent(s). Include major identifying information for each reference and apply a consistent and APA-style flow of information.

(Author's last name, first initial. Title, etc.) For example: Goldberg, N. (1986). Writing down the bones: Freeing the writer within. Boston, MA: Shambhala. Step 3 Feedback Reflection List the feedback you received from your instructor on Writing Activity 3: Rough Draft.

Explain how you used the feedback to improve your essay and create a final, polished version.

Describe the ways you’ll use the feedback in future writing RUBRIC Grading for this activity will be based on the following rubric: 1. Effectiveness of Persuasion Weight: 30% The student is not persuasive or is inappropriately persuasive, does not use a balanced approach, and only applies one appeal: logic, credibility, or emotion. The student attempts to be persuasive and use a balanced approach, but only applies one or two appeals to logic, credibility, and emotion to persuade the audience. The student is somewhat persuasive, uses a somewhat balanced approach, and applies logic, credibility, and emotion to persuade the audience. The student is persuasive, uses a balanced approach, and applies logic, credibility, and emotion to effectively persuade the audience. The student is highly persuasive, uses a well-bal- anced approach and strong application of logic, credibility, and emotion to effectively persuade the audience. POINTS: 215 Criteria Unacceptable Below 60% F Fair 70-79% C Proficient 80-89% B Exemplary 90-100% A Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D FINAL WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT: PERSUASIVE ESSAY 2. Clarity of Ideas Weight: 25% The student does not explain or incompletely explains ideas.

Ideas may not build logically from one point to the next. Commu- nication is not clear, straightfor- ward, and/or easy to understand.

Ideas do not flow smoothly from one to the next. The student ineffectively explains ideas and ideas ineffectively build logically from one point to the next.

Communication is not completely clear, straightfor- ward, and/or easy to understand.

Ideas may not flow smoothly from one to the next. The student partially explains ideas and ideas somewhat build logically from one point to the next.

Communication is somewhat clear, straightfor- ward, and easy to understand.

Ideas flow somewhat smoothly from one to the next. The student mostly explains ideas and ideas mostly build logically from one point to the next.

Communication is mostly clear, straightforward, and easy to understand.

For the most part, ideas flow smoothly from one to the next. The student fully explains ideas and ideas fully build logically from one point to the next. Commu- nication is completely clear, straightforward, and easy to understand.

Ideas flow smoothly from one to the next. 3. Organization and Structure Weight:

15% The essay is unorganized. It may be missing three or more of the following: an introduction, thesis statement, background information, body paragraphs, counter perspec- tive(s), and conclusion. Body paragraphs are not structured to meet the specific needs of the audience, purpose, and content. The essay is mostly unorga- nized. It may be missing two of the following: an introduction, thesis statement, background information, body paragraphs, counter perspec- tive(s), and conclusion. Body paragraphs are ineffectively structured to meet the specific needs of the audience, purpose, and content. The essay is somewhat organized. It may be missing one of the following: an introduction, thesis statement, background information, body paragraphs, counter perspec- tive(s), and conclusion. Body paragraphs are partially struc- tured to meet the specific needs of the audience, purpose, and content. The essay is mostly organized.

It has an introduction, thesis statement, background information, body paragraphs, counter perspec- tive(s), and conclusion. Body paragraphs are mostly structured to meet the specific needs of the audience, purpose, and content. The essay is well organized. It has an easily identifi- able introduction, thesis statement, background information, body paragraphs, counter perspec- tive(s), and conclusion. Body paragraphs are effectively structured to meet the specific needs of the audience, purpose, and content 4. In-Text Citations and References Page Weight: 15% Did not appropri- ately use in-text citations through- out the essay. No References page. Does not meet the required number of references; all or most references are poor-quality choices. Most citations are missing or have been used improperly in the essay and References page. Does not meet the required number of references or there are some poor-quality reference choic- es. Some in-text citations and References page items are improp- erly placed, missing, or not formatted. Meets the required number of references; most references are high-quality choices. In-text citations and References page are mostly correctly formatted. Meets or exceeds number of required referenc- es; all references are high-quality choices. In-text citations and References page are correctly formatted. 5. Grammar, Mechanics, Punctuation, and APA Formatting Weight:

5% There are numerous mechanics, grammar, and punctuation errors. The paper contains numer- ous formatting errors: it may not be double- spaced; font may be incorrect; margins may not be one-inch on all sides, and there may not be a cover page. It includes none or only one of the following:

headers, pages numbers, or indented paragraphs. There are many mechanics, grammar, and punctuation errors. The paper includes two of the following elements: is double-spaced; font is correct; margins are one-inch on all sides, and there is a cover page. It only includes one of the following elements: headers, page numbers, or indented paragraphs. There are some mechanics, grammar, and punctuation errors that distract the reader. The paper is double-spaced; font is correct; margins are one-inch on all sides, and there is a cover page. It includes two of the following elements:

headers, page numbers, and indented paragraphs. There are minimal mechanics, grammar, and punctuation errors. The paper is double-spaced; font is correct; margins are one-inch on all sides, and there is a cover page. It includes three of the following elements: headers, page numbers, and indented paragraphs. There are no or few mechanics, grammar, and punctuation errors. The paper is double-spaced; font is correct; margins are one-inch on all sides, and there is a cover page. It includes all of the following elements:

headers, page numbers, and indented paragraphs. 6. Feedback Reflection Weight: 10% The student is not reflective, does not make connections, and does not include future strategies to continue improving writing. The student may not be reflective, may not make connections, and/or may not include future strategies to continue improving writing The student is somewhat reflective, makes some connec- tions, and includes some future strategies to continue improving writing The student is reflective, makes connections, and includes future strategies to continue improving writing. The student is highly reflective, makes insightful connections, and includes future strategies to continue improving writing.