Answer these two questions.1. What should Mark have done if Jack still was not able to resolve the problem? 2.  Would it make sense for Mark to assign this problem to someone else now after Jack cou

Discussion 1

1. What should Mark have done if Jack still was not able to resolve the problem? 

Mark would neglect the idea, he had a lot of trust and certainty that Jack would pull off the use of the new idea which would see a cost of layout deliver and fix diminished to attract clients. As much as Mark needed the errand executed by the expert pro, he is seen to waiver little piece after Jack requested that he couldn't find the response for the test sent to him by his supervisor. Presently, Mark puts on a show as for assistance from Jack, by prescribing another agent who in any occasion can try to find some response for the overwhelming layout challenges, his system is best observed as judicious. Stamp has understood that by requesting that Jack prescribe a substitute individual to execute the endeavor, Jack would accept it as a test and possible outflow of competition for Mark's steadfastness. Stamp expected that Jack would not wish to undermine his ability especially ensuing to getting recognitions from the chief. It makes the feeling that Mark did not have any alternative individual to execute the endeavor as by offering the conversation starter, he was depending upon Jacks internal identity. Else, he would not have kept on supporting the endeavor if Jack by one way or another figured out how to turn down his requesting.

2.    Would it make sense for Mark to assign this problem to someone else now after Jack could not solve the problem the second time around?

Doling out the issue to any of his specialists isolated for Jack would not look good as stamp has submitted one of the gravest human resource bungles. It is constantly a terrible thing for the organization to single out and praise one agent from a social event. This philosophy in human resource administration achieves decreased immovability by the staff left. Edwards and Paul proposes even treatment of individual inside any affiliation. For this circumstance, Mark singles out Jack, one of his youths, and showers him with motions of acknowledgment requesting he is the exceptional case who can offer responses for the present troubles. Undeniably abominable, Mark advanced these articulations previously McRoy'srepresentatives. In case Jack had held to the likelihood that the endeavor couldn't be executed to the specific end, it would be careless for Mark to rely upon a substitute delegate. This decision would be unbeneficialas the straggling leftovers of the laborers had starting at now gotten a handle on sold by engravings overemphasis on Jacks phenomenal fitness. Subsequently, it was needy upon Jack to find answers for issues facing the affiliation and complete the endeavor. Whatever other agent would basically assault the organization.

Discussion 2

1. What should Mark have done if Jack still was not able to resolve the problem? 

Mark should not have assumed that if Jack could not do it, it would be impossible. He should have assigned this to some more co-workers so that whoever brings the solution earliest would help in clearing the problem. When such a competition based work is given the employee is bound to get his mind working faster and also think out of the box which would help in saving time and implementing what has been thought of the solution. Every problem is different. It might be possible that this problem would be tough for Jack whereas another employee would be an expert in that area and could help sooner.

2. Would it make sense for Mark to assign this problem to someone else now after Jack could not solve the problem the second time around? 

I would partially agree to assign the work to someone else. I would rather put in this way, Mark should not wait for Jack to fail the second time. To be on the safer side he should disclose the problem to some other co-workers too who he thinks would be capable of cracking the issue.  In fact, I believe that this should be done in the prior stage itself when McRoy first approached Mark. It would make sense to have a backup in case Jack would not be able to solve it. It would rather build enthusiasm among the employee to crack this and be awarded since the employee who solves this would be recognized by the higher authority and in turn proving to be beneficial to the employee. Also from the case study, we are not sure if Jack failed for the second time. But we do know that he might have some chance of getting close to the solution as he requested for two days after being positively triggered by Mark.