Good pm!Can you please help. Please read instructions attached. I will need to disclose the name of the person helping with the Statistics to my professor. She is aware that I am seeking help, as stat

INSTRUCTIONS

Total of Participants: 25

Participants will take the Vanderbilt Assessment before and after intervention

Week 1: Participants will take the Vanderbilt Assessment. The only section of this assessment we are evaluating is the performance section. I have included a copy of the Vanderbilt Assessment so you can review it (for better understanding)

Number of participants at week 1 group educational session: 25

Number of participants at week 2: 23

Number of participants at week 3: 22

Number of participants at week 4. 22

Week 1: 25 patients completed Vanderbilt Assessment –Parent informant (Pre-intervention)

Week 4: 22 patients completed Vanderbilt assessment-Parent informant (post intervention)

Weeks1-4: Participants will be provided with four educational group sessions that would raise awareness about ADHD and that would provide the participants with tips and tools to manage signs and symptoms of ADHD in school age children

Week 4. After the last educational session, participants will take the Vanderbilt Assessment again. The only section of this assessment we are evaluating is the performance section. I have included a copy of the Vanderbilt Assessment so you can review it (for better understanding)

1. Table with demographics. + Graphs/Illustrations. What ever you think would like nice in a power point

2. Table with information of pre-intervention assessment of Vanderbilt Assessment

-Table, Graphs/Illustrations-I also need you to write the explanations

1. Table with information of post intervention (Table, Graphs/Illustration)-I also need the explanations

2. Then I need comparison with mean. A friend recommended to used paired t testing, another friend recommended to use the Statistical Software Package, last edition. A friend gave me a sample of a table, in the last section. (Table, explanations)

3. The graphics must be colorful. I will attach blank slides of a power point, please place graphics and table in the power point,

4. Also I the the write up with graphs and tablets also in paper.

5. I also need your expertise to determine the study design:

I posted flyers and received random phone call of individuals that were interested to participate in this scholarly project.

Participants were screened, to meet inclusion and exclusion criteria.

78 participants were interviewed

42 participants met inclusion and exclusion criteria

25 participants were selected. I selected the participants after I ensured these were able to attend 4 weekly educational sessions in no particular order.

Data Collection and Data Analysis

The demographics section contains the raw data (Below)

1. We need to rewrite the demographics section, once this section is analyzed

2. We need a table with graphics as well showing this data.

3. I need something pretty, easy for others to understand

Demographics. A total of twenty-five participants were recruited for this scholarly project. Nineteen participants were female and six participants were male. All participants were Latinos between the ages of 27 and 52 years of old. Fourteen participants held a Master’s Degree, 2 participants held a Bachelor’s degree, and five participants held and Associates’ degree and four participants completed some college courses. Most participants were married, 22, and only 2 participants reported to be divorced and 3 participants reported to be single. Family income for all participants fluctuated between 80,000 to over 100,000. Fifty percent of the participants reported family income over 150,000 per year, thirty percent of the participants reported income between 100,000-130,000 and twenty percent of participants reported yearly family income between 95,000 to 99,999.

Data Analysis

            Descriptive statistics along with a paired t test will be use to discuss the differences between the performance section of the Vanderbilt assessment pre and post intervention. The purpose of the paired t test is to decide whether the mean difference between paired observations is statistically significant from zero. Using the paired t test will help appreciate whether there is a difference in parental perception before and after intervention. Detailed demographic information will be collected and illustrated in table 1. Gathered data on the Performance Section of the NICHQ Vanderbilt Assessment Scale pre-intervention will be entered in Microsoft Excel and illustrated in Table 2. A pair t test analysis will be used to determine if statistical significance is present in the pre and post intervention scores of the Vanderbilt Assessment. The investigator will follow the same process for data collected post intervention. This data will be analyzed by a simple paired t-test of the difference using the same program and illustrated on Table 3. The overall child’s performance based on the parent perception will be illustrated also in Table 3.

This Table is Incorrect. Similar Table or Better. I don’t like this table, maybe you have a better idea.

Table Below is just an Example. Data is wrong. Please use the following data

I need one table Pre-Intervention

I need one table Post intervention

Total participants: 25

Pre-Intervention

This constitute the Performance Section of the Vanderbilt Assessment. Parents completed this section before intervention and post intervention. We need to create a table with graphics that shows this information both before and after intervention

25 participants completed the Vanderbilt assessment

Post intervention. Patient will be administered the Vanderbilt assessment again. The only section that we are evaluating is the Performance Section. Results were as follows

22 participants completed the Vanderbilt assessment post interventions

1. Need table with graphics, illustration

2. Comparison in graphics from pre and post test

1. Analysis of the data

-Where the interventions helpful? Yes or No

-If yes, in what ways. What areas did not improve etc..

What areas improved, what areas remained the same, what areas need further improvement?

This is the wrong table. Please use statistics provided