hi, please look into the attached file and make a PPT of 7 to 8 slides covering all topics mentioned in the questionary.

Assessment item 3: Individual Oral Strategy Presentation

Length: 7-8 minutes

Task

Concentrating on an organisation with which you are familiar, you will be required to compile and deliver an 7-8 minute strategy presentation to your CEO (i.e. me !). The presentation will need to summarise a sustainability strategy for the next 2 to 3 years for your chosen organisation including specific key Performance Indicators (KPIs).

The presentation should be no more than 8-9 slides and cover those elements of sustainability covered in Weeks 1 to 10. You will be assessed primarily on your knowledge of sustainability and ability to package and communicate this coherently. It is important that you do not simply regurgitate the current strategy of the organisation but focus on innovative sustainability ideas for the future and their tangible, strategic benefits for the organisation, KPIs and how you will measure them.

Basic Format (Your presentation should include)

Cover page
Company Background
The sustainability strategy (1-2 strategies will be sufficient) with explanation and implementation process
Benefits of the strategies recommended to your organization
Challenges of implementing the strategies and how to overcome them
Key Performance Indicators to measure and evaluate the strategies
Conclusion
Reference List

Note*: This is sustainability subject, the strategies recommended must be based on any of the elements of sustainability that were covered in your lecture and from the prescribed textbook.

Essential reading

Moscardo et al (2013), Chapter 7
Banerjee, SB (2011) ‘Embedding Sustainability across the organisation:
A Critical Perspective’ Academy of Management Learning and Education, 10:4, pp. 719-731.
Dunphy.D, Griffiths.A and Benn.S. (2007), Organizational change for corporate sustainability:
a guide for leaders and change agents of the future (Chapter 5). Routledge, London.

‘If CEOs hold the key to climate change, why aren't they driving?’. This reading can be accessed via this link.

This assessment task will assess the following learning outcome/s:

be able to define and explain the concepts of sustainability and sustainable development.
be able to describe stakeholder theory and construct stakeholder maps for particular businesses.
be able to identify a range of frameworks for sustainability and assess a business's sustainability performance against these various frameworks.
be able to identify, analyse and describe how sustainability can provide a source of innovation and competitive advantage to businesses.
be able to research and evaluate the social and environmental risks and opportunities which impact on a particular business, use these to build a sustainability strategy for this business, and create a plan for improvement over the next two to three years.

Assessment Item 3 has been designed to test both your understanding of the modules and your ability to apply and communicate this knowledge in a workplace context, albeit somewhat synthesised.

Marking criteria and standards

Criterion	LO	HD (85-100%)	D (75-84%)	CR (65-74%)	P (64-50%)	F (>.50%)
Content & knowledge of key sustainability theories and frameworks – · Breadth/depth of knowledge · Use of literature/evidence of research) · An ability to apply these appropriately to ‘real world’ case studies (15 Marks)	1,2,3,5,6	Assignment work demonstrates appropriate selection and integration of theory. Able to consider and expand on topics and issues in the broader disciplinary context. Demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding and has insights and awareness of deeper more subtle aspects of the topic content. Evidence of having researched/read more widely beyond the core materials. Ability to apply these in a consistent and appropriate manner to real world case studies.	Assignment demonstrates good selection and integration of theory. Able to consider topics and issues in the broader disciplinary context. Demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding and has insights and awareness of many of the deeper more subtle aspects of the topic content. Evidence of having read beyond the core materials. Ability to apply these in a consistent and appropriate manner to real world case studies.	Sound knowledge of principles and concepts. Relevant key theories, ideas are included in the work in an appropriate manner. Demonstrates thorough understanding of material presented in core texts and readings. Ability to apply these in a consistent and appropriate manner to some real world case studies.	Knowledge of principles and concepts sufficient to communicate intelligently about the topic. Demonstrates evidence of having read material presented in core texts and readings. However literature is presented uncritically in a purely descriptive manner. Content acknowledged but not really taken into account. Some ability to apply these in a consistent and appropriate manner to real world case studies.	Knowledge of principles and concepts insufficient to communicate intelligently about the topic. Demonstrates very little evidence of having read material presented in core texts and readings. Inaccurate or inconsistent acknowledgment of sources. If evident, key ideas are presented uncritically in a purely descriptive manner. Limited knowledge of key principles and concepts presented in the Unit of Study Limited ability to apply these in a consistent and appropriate manner to real world case studies.
Present your strategy clearly and cogently to your peer group - · Clarity in explanation – clearly structured, developing argument · Presentation skills · Recommendations for future practice. · Use of respectful language to discuss all people; avoiding emotive language; employing inclusive, non-sexist language. (15 Marks)		Presentation is clearly structured with information presented to an audience that is understandable, supported by explanatory materials, clearly understood aurally, and includes recommendations for practice. Sophisticated level of professional language achieved.	Presentation is clearly structured with information presented to an audience that is understandable, supported by some explanatory materials, clearly understood aurally, and includes limited recommendations for practice and use of respectful language.	Presentation is well structured with information presented to an audience that is understandable, supported by some explanatory materials, clearly understood aurally, and includes some recommendations for practice. . Solid level of professional language used.	Presentation is reasonably structured with information presented to an audience that is mostly understandable, supported by limited explanatory materials, adequately understood aurally, and includes limited recommendations for practice. Only general level of professional language achieved	Presentation is poorly structured with information presented to an audience that lacks clarity, has limited supporting materials, mot clearly understood aurally, and lacks any recommendations for practice. Language not professional, inclusive or respectful.
Peer engagement - · Students’ understanding demonstrated through reflection on their own experiences in collaborative or shared work · Prompt response to questioning (10 Marks)		Presentation shows critical reflection on your own experiences and reflects the evaluation and synthesis of peer proposals and responses. Further, responses to questions are prompt and comprehensive.	Presentation shows some critical reflection on your own experiences and reflects some evaluation and synthesis of views from study peers and work colleagues. Further, responses to questions are prompt and comprehensive.	Presentation shows some reflection on your own experiences and reflects some evaluation and synthesis of views from study peers and work colleagues. Further, responses to questions are mostly prompt and comprehensive	Presentation shows some reflection on your own experiences and on the views from study peers and work colleagues. Further, responses to questions are reasonably prompt and mostly comprehensive	Presentation shows limited reflection on your own experiences and on the views from study peers and work colleagues. Further, responses to questions are lacking in promptness and comprehensiveness.