I am sending you attach , the article, the Pico worksheet original and revised with the research question. Please, review the PICO question revised to see if it is correct after I made the corrections

I am sending you attach , the article, the Pico worksheet original and revised with the research question. Please, review the PICO question revised to see if it is correct after I made the corrections 1

CRITICAL APPRAISAL CHECKLIST: QUALITATIVE RESEARCH

How do you rate this paper? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

OBJECTIVES, HYPOTHESES

Yes

No

Are the objectives (aims) of the study clearly stated?

DESIGN

Is the study design suitable for the study question/objectives?

Did the researcher aim to understand and describe views/experiences of participants?

Was this the right sample to answer the study question?

Did the researcher recruit participants with appropriate experiences and in appropriate settings to identify key themes to answer the study question?

Is the study large enough to achieve its objectives?

Were all participants accounted for?

Was ethical approval obtained?

MEASUREMENT, OBSERVATION

Is the phenomenon clearly stated?

How was the phenomenon measured, and was it appropriate to the study design?

Was the data recording independently verifiable (audio or videotape)?

Is there an audit trail?

PRESENTATION OF RESULTS, ANALYSIS

Are results adequately described?

Do the researchers describe elements of rigor in the conduct of the study? (ie., confirmability, credibility, reflexivity, dependability, transferability)?

Are illustrative quotes given to support developing themes?

Did the researcher use appropriate methods to enable the study to meet its objectives?

Is it clear how the researcher analyzed the data?

DISCUSSION

Are results discussed in relation to existing knowledge of the phenomenon and study objectives?

Are results plausible and coherent?

Is the discussion biased?

Does the researcher critically examine his or her role, potential bias and influence?

Was the research explained to the study participants?

INTERPRETATION

Are the authors’ conclusions justified by the data?

Was the study question answered?

Does this study help you answer your clinical problem?

Were study participants similar to your patients?

Can any necessary change be implemented in practice based on these results?

Are there barriers to implementation?

How do you rate this paper now? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

References

BestBETs (Best Evidence Topics) (2018). Critical appraisal: Qualitative. Retrieved from

https://bestbets.org/links/BET-CA-worksheets.php

Buccheri, R.K., & Sharifi, C. (2017). Critical appraisal tools and reporting guidelines for evidence-based practice.

Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 14(6), 463–472.

9.2019 MSN5300 KmR