Hello, I need TWO research papers that are in APA (Purdue writing) format and  that will pass the turnitin.com/a paper that has never been written before. I have never done this before so the price is

Question 1: 

The first one is regarding one of the “white papers”. The syllabus ask we read the “How to Analyze a Research Study.” I did not find a paper with that specific title. I did see “How to Analyze a Research Study” title in the course home page but the actual file has a title of “How to Summarize a Research Article” when I opened it. To me, analyze and summarize are different. You summarize to give a brief description of an article but you scrutinize or investigate when you analyze an article.

I designed the white papers to fully explain assignments.  The opportunity for graduate level mastery is enhanced throughout the course through these assignments. The assignments build on each other with the Research Study Articles /Journal Review assignments intended to include a SUMMARY of the article AND an ANALYSIS of the article content.   You are correct.  You summarize to give a brief description of the article, providing your fellow students an opportunity for an overview.  And secondly you analyze the article, using scrutiny and in depth investigation.   These two requirements are not mutually exclusive.   

The description of these assignments details these two components in that a summary is required and then you are directed to answer several questions regarding the research study article that you are reviewing.  These questions are analytical.   You may find it helpful to answer additional questions about the article, particularly on topics that become relevant to your own Research Proposal for this course.  Graduate level answers are, of course, expected.   

If the real intent is to summarize, I go it. Maybe a different article was posted, not the one with the intended title (analyze).  

The article is entitled "How to Summarize a Research Study" is correctly posted.   The article includes the analytical questions, providing guidance and direction for analyzing the article as well as summarizing it. 

If the confusion is really about the title of the white paper, you can ignore that.  The article directs you to summarize and analyze.   

I hope  you are clear in regard to the set of assignments referred.  All students will find that the summary portion is direct, even simple perhaps.   The analysis requires higher order skills and may well prove more difficult.  You and all students will find that you become more skilled with the analysis as you review more articles and become more familiar with research study methods.

Question 2. 

On the Preliminary Research Proposal, the syllabus on page two states “The paper will be the first half of your Final Research Proposal or Evaluation Plan.”  If I go to the “white paper” titled “Research Proposal Outline”, I see it segmented from I to IV. As I read it, does half mean to write what is instructed on the first section (I) only? If not, what does it mean by “first half”?

First, the syllabus in  general is  less detailed than the assignment descriptions.   When in doubt, you will find more details with the assignment descriptions.   

The "first half" term is general, to mean that your Preliminary Research Proposal is the beginning of your Final Research Proposal.  It doesn't mean that is exactly one half.   It certainly does NOT mean that your preliminary research paper is to be only part of section I.  from the outline provided. 

If you read the white paper, "How to Get the Bang for Your Buck" you will see that all the assignments in this course build upon each other, giving you additional research skills and opportunities to apply those skills throughout, until you will, piece by piece have the knowledge and experience to complete a Research Proposal.  

If you read the complete descriptions of the PRELIMINARY RESEARCH PROPOSAL and the FINAL RESEARCH PROPOSAL, you will see that you complete I, III, IV, and V from the outline provided for the Preliminary Research Proposal.    You will revise and correct the preliminary paper and then add sections  II, VI, and VII from the outline for the Final Research Proposal. 

Question 2A  Oops I missed one!

The statement states “The paper will be the first half of your Final Research Proposal or Evaluation Plan.” Does this mean we have a choice of writing a Final Proposal or an Evaluation Plan? This read as a choice whether to wrote one type of paper or another. Am I correct?  If so, I would like to know what is the criteria for an evaluation plan.

Evaluation Plans are not recommended for this course.  They are suitable only for students that are professionally involved in HRDV activities and desirous of comparing HRDV programs within their work environment.  It is rare that students in this course seek to propose the intense level of research required for an evaluation plan.   In my opinion an evaluation plan should be proceeded by approval from the University Internal Review Committee.   You would be responsible for providing the criteria, subject to professional research standards and the privacy and protection requirements of the Internal Review Committee.  As you can see, the Evaluation Plan option is too complex to be undertaken within the confines of this intense online schedule.   

Question 3

Lastly, the syllabus states on page 3 “You will select a group of professionals to evaluate the survey and make recommendations.” I would like to have more specifics, please.

Again, you will find more specific information in the assignment description.   This assignment is due Week 7.  It would be more helpful to address questions regarding this task later on in the course, perhaps during Week 6, once the survey itself is developed and other students are considering their own work on this activity. 

Thank you for your questions regarding specific phrases in the syllabus.