Originally having the draft 1 Need to expand the draft 1 to 1200-1400 words The requirements are in the draft 1 No plagiarism Please ask the same person to continue to write it Prompt.docx neyrat1.pdf

The intersection of Technological Companies and Governmental Regulations

Technology is advancing at a very high rate leading to changes in the business handling process globally, especially for technological companies such as Apple Inc., Google, Amazon, IBM, among many others. The advanced technology world is characterized by increased interactions between consumers and technological corporations via different social media platforms such as corporation websites, Facebook, among others. Government is the governing body involved in the governance of the interactions between the technological corporations and their consumers. The consumers and corporations have the right to individual data, but it is suffering issues of privacy, leading to some avoiding to shop online.(reason) Technology advancement is also associated with increased pollution through emissions of greenhouse gases (Neyrat 57). Technology is made to improve human life but increased pollution by technology companies, and unprotected privacy on online data by the government risks human life safety.(reason) Public government regulations that can adapt to technological changes are required to empower innovations driven by data privacy and environmental protection.

According to the words of Neyrat, the main aim of stewardship of the Earth is to ensure the protection of human's welfare through the protection of the environment but not to safeguard people from the background (Neyrat 57). Earth's stewardship should be based on the viewpoint that can integrate more approaches and metrics than the environmentalists had traditionally considered. Neyrat agrees to the fact that technology is right as it makes human life comfortable hence cannot be resisted by human beings. However, the writer suggests that technologies are implemented by people with the capability to make a variety of innovations, such as the use of alternative sources of energy other than the use of fuel in technological advancement.This information indicates that humanity has the power to control pollution in technologically advancing world through intersecting and taking conscious actions.

Neyret talks about Anthropocene's dualistic political groups to emphasize the need of government to counter power the technologically aided stewardship of the Earth, which is harmful to the environment hence causing climate change (Neyrat 59). The technically supported stewardship focuses on spontaneously generating different technologies unconsciously to progress but deny the setting by technological companies and unconscious utilization by consumers. The government should counter power this stewardship by creating laws to govern protection of the environment and personal rights on individual or technological company online data which justifies the intersection.

Dalby expounds on occurring changes in the physical environment as a result of practices that provide security to specific forms of humanoid life. He mentions substantial social order driven by carboniferous private enterprises and entrepreneurs that utilize these practices to secure humans. The social order represents the technological companies powered by fuel utilizing machines that pollute the environment and practices are used to describe current innovations made to improve human life. Dalby mentions climate change and security as one vital scope related to the future that government (biopolitical) approaches of risk and contingency management have botched to address effectually (Dalby 87). This information indicates that some technological perils are not governed by the government and the need for the intersection between all the components and bring a positive change.

Dalby interprets that argument about association climate and safety stresses that Anthropocene’s environmental situations require altered biopolitics for better handling (Dalby 85). Technology should protect human, and the environment's safety protects human from dangers associated with climate change as a result of pollution. Current knowledge in the management of risk is not capable of adequate protection for the human. The intersection is required for the government to generate laws that govern consumer-corporation relationships and security of individual information online. Dalby suggestion for new biopolitics supports the thesis that public government regulations that can adapt to technological changes are required to empower innovations driven by data privacy and environmental protection.

Works Cited

Dalby, Simon. “Biopolitics and Climate Security in the Anthropocene.” Geoforum, vol. 49, Oct. 2013, pp. 184-192. ScienceDirect, doi: do.doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.06.13.

Neyret, Frederic. "The Logic of Geo power: Power, Management, and Earth Stewardship." The Unconstructable Earth: AnEcology of Separation. Fordham U, 2019, pp. 56-67.

Revise requirement:

Start writing my sub-claim, (not the ideas of the authors) my argument should be the dominant.

Write the argument with the Anthropocene (More about Anthropocene instead of technology)

Use the authors’ ideas to support my claim.

What evidence defend these. Explain the link.

Do with the climate issue.