Literary Criticism This Task has Part A - Part F which is in the attached file. New Criticism was a school of literary criticism that emerged in the mid-twentieth century. It rejected the traditional

Literary Criticism Part A - Part F Part A Write an analysis of the poem with a special emphasis on its historical background and Elizabeth Browning’s life story (a historical or biographical approach). Answer: Part B Write an analysis of the poem from the New Criticism perspective, closely examining the form and content of the text itself without any reference to t he historical or biographical context or to your personal response to the poem. Answer: Part C Write about your own personal reaction (emotional response) to the poem. Try to explain how you approached the poem and how your opinion could shape or change it s meaning. Answer: Part D In this part of the activity, you will evaluate your three critiques of the poem. You will first need to recall what you learned about intentional and affective fallacies in this unit. W. K. Wimsatt and Monroe Beardsley coined bot h terms. The term intentional fallacy refers to the idea that an author’s purpose or intention in writing a work of literature has no importance in appreciating or critiquing that work. The term affective fallacy refers to the idea that how a work affects a reader or what emotions it arouses in the reader have no importance in appreciating or critiquing that work. Read this Knowledge Article to learn more about New Criticism and the adjective and intentional fallacies. Evaluate your response to part A. Exp lain the disadvantages of emphasizing background information, such as historical context when critiquing a poem. Be sure to include examples from your analyses. Answer: Part E Now evaluate your response to Part B. List any advantages or disadvantages in u sing the New Critical approach when evaluating a poem, including examples from your analyses. Answer: Part F Finally, evaluate your analysis of Part C. What are the advantages and disadvantages of emphasizing personal bias and emotion when critiquing a po em? Include examples of your analysis when possible. Answer: