Hey there, Disaster Summary #3 - hurricane or severe weather event (CASE STUDY) I have attached 3 files for instructions and rubric rules. Please go through.

GEOG 2272 - Disaster Summary Rubric Total: /100 = / 6.7 CATEGORY Excellent/Exceptional Good/Very Good Adequate/Satisfactory Marginal /Unacceptable Introduction /10 Exceptional introduction that provides an exemplary overview of the natural disaster summary . All r elevant terms clearly defined using academic & discipline appropriate referenced definitions. Proficient introduction that provides a good overview of the natural disaster summary. Most r elevant terms defined using discipline appropriate referenced definitions. Adequate introduction that states the topic, & provides an adequate overview of the natural disaster summary . Some terms defined which may be relevant/irrelevant & referenced using a combination of non - academic /academic &/ or discipline specific /non - discipline definitions . Limited introduction that may state topic but lack s sufficient overview of the natural disaster summary. Limited /or files to define relevant terms, some of which are irrelevant & are not referenced. Natural Disaster Summar y /30 Discusses & extensively develops disaster information & disaster themes using e xtensive critical insight with numerous supporting examples that are fully & appropriately referenced. Exceptionally integrates geographic concepts learned in the course. Recognizes & sufficiently develops disaster information & disaster themes with g ood insight & adequate supporting examples that are appropriately referenced. Mostly integrates geographic concepts learned in the course. May recognize , but does not sufficiently develop disaster information & disaster themes with limited insight & few supporting examples that are somewhat referenced. Adequate ly integrates geographic concepts learned in the course. Limited acknowledgement of disaster information & insufficient development of disaster themes with minimal , if any , supporting examples that are minimally , if at all, referenced. Minimal integration of geographic concepts learned in the course. Mitigation statements /10 Cle ar , c oncise , & realistic mitigation statement (s), which t horoughly discusses ways to feasibly mitigate the disaster supported by highly credible, scholarly sources Well - articulated & reasonable mitigation statement (s), which a dequately discusses ways to reasonably mitigate the disaster supported by scholarly sources . Includes a brief mention of (a) mitigation statement(s), which m inimally discusses reasonable &/or unreasonable ways to mitigate disaster . Limited mention of (a) mitigation (s) statement which is/are unclear &/or unrealistic . Conclusion /10 Insightful and exceptional discussion that reviews key themes & spatial patterns. Excellent integration with introduction. Proficient discussion that reviews key themes & spatial patterns. Strong integration with introduction. Adequate discussion that somewhat reviews key themes & spatial patterns. Some integration with introduction. Va gue discussion that minimally reviews themes and spatial patterns Minimal integration with introduction . Continued on next page . . . . CATEGORY Excellent/Exceptional Good/Very Good Adequate/Satisfactory Marginal/Unacceptable Quality, Credibility, Variety Of Sources /1 0 All sources highly credible. Expertly integrates scholarly/peer - reviewed sources where appropriate. Clearly demonstrates alternate perspectives through a wide variety of sources ( author/journal/type). Most sources credible. Appropriately integrates scholarly/peer - reviewed sources where appropriate. Several alternate perspectives identified through a good variety of sources ( author/journal/type) . Some sources credible. Lack of &/or inappropriate integration of scholarly/peer - reviewed sources. Adequate alternate perspectives identified through some variet y of sources ( author/journal/type) . Few sources credible. Lack of & inappropriate integration of scholarly/peer - reviewed sources. Few alternate perspectives identified & a poor variety of sources ( author/journal/type) . Writing Fluency / 10 Virtually free from mechanical, grammatical, punctuation, & spelling errors . Consistently & expertly utilizes formal academic tone & writing protocols. Occasional minor erro rs do not distract the reader. Proficiently utilizes formal academic tone & writing protocols. Some significant errors are present, but the overall me aning is clear Some utilization of formal academic tone & writing protocols. Errors are distracting , but the meaning is still clear. Minimal utilization of formal academic tone & writing protocols. Figures/Tables /10 Expertly & e ffectively includes pertinent figures/ tables into text that clarify concepts & supplement/strengthen summary. Figures/ tables are exceptionally integrated, r eferred to in the text & labelled using a modified AP A format Proficiently includes relevant figures/ tables into text that clarify concepts & supports summary. Figures/ tables are proficiently integrated , referred to in the text & labele d mostly a modified APA format Adequately includes figures/ tables into text that are somewhat unclear & vaguely supports summary. Figures/ tables are referred to in the text and s omewhat properly labele d a modified APA format Figures/ tables included in text, but fail to adequately support summary. Figures/ tables are not referred to in the text & improperly labele d a modified APA f ormat . Modified APA & Format /10 All c itations & paper components are formatted correctly in the document. Document exceptionally visually appealing and laid out, flows well & very easy read. Most c itations & paper components are formatted correctly in the document . Document visually appealing, good layout & flow & easy to read. Some c itations & paper components are formatted correctly in the document . Document somewhat visually appealing, adequate layout, flow & readability. Few c itations & paper components are formatted correctly in the document . Document not particularly visually appealing, layout unappealing , lacks flow &/or readability. Comments: Late Penal ty : 10 % per day once the due date/time has elapsed