can someone finish this quick assignment for me today?

Read “Dueling Conclusions on State Disinvestment” and respond to the following:

1. Outline the article (there are instructions for this in the reading for 3.1) including the two positions and the claims and evidence for both.

2. For one position, write one sentence stating the main claim (include a signal phrase (Links to an external site.), direct quote, and in-text citation) and one sentence explaining the evidence used to support the main claim (format direct source material if you use it and don’t forget to note the source of the information).

3. For the other position, write one sentence stating the main claim (include a direct quote and a signal phrase) and one sentence explaining the evidence used to support the main claim (format direct source material if you use it and don’t forget to note the source of the information).

4. Write a one-paragraph summary of the article (note what the sides agree and disagree on and discuss why the findings are different). 

5. Write a one-sentence summary of the article (include a signal phrase)

6. What is the thesis of “Dueling Conclusions on State Disinvestment”? Does the article endorse one perspective over the other? 

7. Write one sentence explaining how one of the positions and its claims and evidence can be used to support your position in relation to funding for USF. 

8. Write one sentence stating and refuting the other position in relation to your position.