Summarize the information in the article in about 1000 words and evaluate the article using the CRAAPO rubric. -Ensure your in-text citation/s is /are included correctly. https://journals.sagepub.c

RUBRIC FOR SUMMARIZING AN ARTICLE

Criteria	Excellent	Good	Average	Satisfactory	Poor
Appropriate details in the summary 25 points	21-25	16-20	11-15	6-10	1-5
Judicious choice of details maximizes interest and understanding.	All relevant details presented. Details not critical to understanding omitted.	Enough critical details presented for understanding. Unnecessary details generally omitted.	Most important details included but may include too much or too little detail for easy understanding.	Some critical details are missing. Unnecessary details may be present.
Writer’s evaluation of the article 20 points	17-20	13-16	9-12	5-8	1-4
Excellent attempt at evaluation of the article. The CRAAPO rubric is complete, and the article is correctly evaluated.	Good attempt at evaluation of the article. The CRAAPO rubric is somewhat complete, and the article is somewhat correctly evaluated.	Fair attempt at evaluation of the article. The CRAAPO rubric is somewhat incomplete, and the article is somewhat wrongly evaluated.	Minimal attempt at evaluation of the article. The CRAAPO rubric is incomplete, and the article is wrongly evaluated.	No attempt to evaluate the article. The CRAAPO rubric is missing.
Clarity of explanation 20 points	17-20	13-16	9-12	5-8	1-4
Sophisticated use of language maximizes interest , enjoyment and comprehension; explanations are very clear and are factually correct.	All explanations are clear and easy to understand and are factually correct.	Most explanations are clear, easy to understand, and are mostly factually correct.	Overall meaning is understandable; possibly some areas of slight confusion and minor factual errors.	Serious difficulty explaining ideas, contains major factual errors and lacks comprehensibility
Writing style 15 points	13-15	10-12	7-9	4-6	1-3
Sophisticated, elegant, complex yet lucid sentence structure and flawless grammar. Excellent paraphrasing skills applied.	Error-free, easy to read writing style, well-practiced and polished use of language. Good paraphrasing skills applied.	Good basic writing style, easy to read, few errors, almost entirely in author's own words, little paraphrasing, and use of many unnecessary quotations.	Mostly basic, correct writing style, relatively few errors, minimal use of unnecessary quotations and paraphrasing done moderately.	Serious errors, excessive use of quotations in place of author's own words, hardly any paraphrasing skills applied.
Research Documentation 10 points	9-10	7-8	5-6	3-4	1-2
Summary contains no errors in documentation (including in-text citation/s, signal phrases, and reference list ). Student introduces and analyzes found information in a professional manner.	Minimal documentation errors exist; student understands how to use signal phrases, cite sources, compile a reference list, and in general, introduce and analyze found information.	Some documentation errors exist, but student generally understands how to use signal phrases, cite sources, compile a reference list, and in general, introduce and analyze found information.	Many documentation errors exist, but student mostly understands how to use signal phrases, cite sources, compile a reference list, and in general, introduce and analyze found information.	Found information is not documented correctly. Errors exist with signal phrases, citations, and reference list. Found information is not introduced adequately.
Overall organization 10 points	9-10	7-8	5-6	3-4	1-2
Overall purpose, methods, results and conclusions of study clearly stated; seemingly effortless and logical flow.	Overall purpose, methods, results and conclusions of study clearly stated; good logical flow.	Purpose, methods, results and conclusions clearly stated; most of the presentation flows logically.	Purpose, methods, results and conclusions stated; possibly some illogical flow.	Major sections missing and/or lack of logical flow.