looking for someone good

Unit 3 Video Summary, Analysis & Synthesis

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=84VyogMSuv0

After viewing the designated videos, summarize and evaluate the overall content of all by selecting one of the following: 1) writing a 2–3 paragraph, well-crafted narrative response, 2) making a detailed bulleted listing of the most important content presented, OR 3) create a detailed graphic overview / concept map of the major content and supporting details. Then, in a summary paragraph, synthesize the information learned and briefly compare the overall content, making at least 2 personal connections and providing at least 3 “Aha Moments.”

Science of Reading or Science of Teaching Reading Infographic

Following the instructions provided, use the technology tool, Canva, to create an infographic that could be used with colleagues, parents, and other significant stakeholders to provide an overview of the philosophy and components Science of Reading / Science of Teaching Reading components and processes, focusing on how the parts work together to build and strengthen students’ literacy skills.

View the rubric to see how this will be evaluated.

Canva Directions Handout.pdf download

Minimize File Preview

Rubric

Science of Reading (SOR) / Science of Teaching Reading (STR) Infographic Grading Rubric

Science of Reading (SOR) / Science of Teaching Reading (STR) Infographic Grading Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction

10 to >9.0 pts

Project includes an explanatory paragraph of introduction on the theory and practices of SOR.

9 to >8.0 pts

Project provides adequate introduction on the theory and practices of SOR.

8 to >6.0 pts

Project provides minimal introduction on the theory and practices of SOR.

6 to >0 pts

Project fails to include any form of introduction regarding the theory and practices of SOR.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSOR/ STR Process

35 to >31.5 pts

Project reflects thorough and accurate explanation of all components of STR practices.

31.5 to >28.0 pts

Project adequately addresses all steps of STR practices.

28 to >21.0 pts

Project partially addresses steps of STR practices.

21 to >0 pts

Project does not accurately explain steps of STR practices.

35 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDigital Images

25 to >22.5 pts

Project includes at least 5 images related to components of SOR/STR.

22.5 to >20.0 pts

Project includes at least 4 relevant images related to components of SOR/STR.

20 to >17.5 pts

Project includes 2-3 relevant images related to components of SOR/STR.

17.5 to >0 pts

Project includes less than 2 relevant images related to components of SOR/STR.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormat

15 to >13.5 pts

Project is professionally presented with appropriate text formatting.

13.5 to >12.0 pts

Project reflects adequate text formatting.

12 to >10.5 pts

Project reflects minimal attention to appropriate text formatting.

10.5 to >0 pts

Project is poorly formatted.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics

15 to >13.5 pts

No grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors.

13.5 to >12.0 pts

1-2 grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors.

12 to >10.5 pts

3-4 grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors.

10.5 to >0 pts

More than 4 grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors.

15 pts

Total Points: 100

PreviousNext