I have attached the spreadsheet for this assignment and my past two assignments to help. The purpose of this assignment is to review the root causes of the problem and all of the previously tried, as
STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS DOCUMENT
STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS DOCUMENT
Name of Stakeholder | Description of Stakeholder | Role of Stakeholder | Level of Knowledge in Program | Available Resources, Information, Influence, Money, Staff, Technology, etc. | Level of Interest | Level of Support | Level of Influence | Action Plan for Stakeholder Engagement |
Example: Call Center Manager | Leader of the Call Center in Phoenix | Project Sponsor | High level of knowledge | Funding of project and internal resources from call center | High | Positive | High | Maintain regular communication with stakeholder on progress and updates. |
clients | they will be the service users, therefore our services will meet their preferences | will pay for the services received | low level of knowledge | They will fund the project by paying for services. | Moderate | Positive | Low | do not make decisions |
investors | The risk takers to fund our activities. | they will be funding our project | low level of knowledge | They will fund the project by paying for services. | High | Positive | Moderate | do not make decisions |
engineers | the qualified personnel to test and deliver our services | involved in testing, installations and maintaining the parking spaces regularly | High level of knowledge | Actively participate in project development. | High | Positive | High | Maintain regular communication with stakeholder on progress and updates. |
security/police | controlling the activities within the parking | report and charge those destroying property and unauthorized parking | low level of knowledge | they will protect the resources and charge the wrongdoers | Moderate | Positive | Moderate | regular communication with the stakeholders regarding parking violations |
project managers | the leaders during project implementation | ensure that the project is achieved within the set time and cost | High level of knowledge | Actively participate in project development. | High | Positive | High | Maintain regular communication with stakeholder on progress and updates. |
sponsors | The interest groups seeking to fund the project. | responsible for donating the finances to develop the project | low level of knowledge | They will fund the project by paying for services. | Moderate | Positive | Low | do not make decisions |
Over the past decade, vehicle production and purchase have increased significantly.
Additionally the need for better roads and more fuel has also increased gradually. Finally there has been an increase in parking space demand especially within the major cities and populated streets. However the automated and smart parking services are among the major government’s solutions. Therefore for this paper we will be analyzing the concept of parking space from the stakeholder’s point. We will be holding a discussion related to automated vehicle parking and promoting teamwork among the involved employees. Pala & Inanc (2007).
For the smart parking services to succeed, we have first to locate the preferences and involved stakeholders. Several stakeholders will be involved in the process of developing this project, including; the clients. These will be the people involved in using the services; therefore, our services have to meet their demands and preferences. The users will pay for our services which will generate revenue and profits for resource acquisition and wages. Therefore without proper customer support, the services may not succeed.
The investors will be the second group whose responsibility will be to fund our projects. For the project to succeed within the university, potential investors are willing to risk their money for project development. The Engineers is another potential group involved in testing, installations and maintaining the parking spaces regularly. This will ensure that once the services stop functioning, the executives will solve the problems. Will be responsible for developing the smart parking, ensuring that the system is highly effective and integrated with the old one. Additionally, the engineers will regularly test the services to ensure they are within the correct standards; additionally, they will keep researching potential ways to improve the services to improve customer satisfaction. Geng & Cassandras (2012).
The university security is another group whose responsibility will be to control the events within the smart parking place by ensuring that people park within the authorized spots. If one destroys properly, they are charged immediately. Therefore the police will be essential in promoting peace and resource protection. Project managers will be responsible for ensuring that the project is achieved within the set time and cost. Additionally, the project manager will supervise other employees and check how the project progresses with regular maintenance of the destroyed parts. Our final group will be the project sponsors responsible for donating the finances to develop the project. The sponsors will include interest groups like investors, students, and governmental officials, who are willing to ensure that our project succeeds. Wang & He (2011).
For our services to function effectively as predicted, the system should ensure that the clients can easily identify the right parking spots and have the autonomy to use their most preferred. There should also be an automated and continued monitoring system that ensures that those violating the parking laws are reported automatically for relevant actions against them. Finally, reports should be generated automatically regarding the utilization of the parking space and the financed generated. My opinion is that smart parking will be essential in reducing vehicle parking violations, problems in looking for the right spot and tracking of a parked vehicle’s positions.
References
Pala, Z., & Inanc, N. (2007, September). Smart parking applications using RFID technology. In 2007 1st Annual RFID Eurasia (pp. 1-3). IEEE. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/4368108/
Geng, Y., & Cassandras, C. G. (2012). A new “smart parking” system infrastructure and implementation. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 54, 1278-1287. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042812043042
Wang, H., & He, W. (2011, April). A reservation-based smart parking system. In 2011 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS) (pp. 690-695). IEEE. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/5928901/