AACSB Outcome 3.1 Assessment of Ethical Reasoning.
AACSB Outcome 3.1 Assessment of Ethical Reasoning
The purpose of this assignment is to test your ethical reasoning ability based on the rubric in the syllabus and attached below. There are two questions and a total of 110 points.
This case study is from the Appendix 4A of the Chapter. There are no right answers and your ethical reasoning ability is being assessed. . For this Assignment we are doing Scenario no. 3 page 179 pasted below.
[This is 10% of the class grade. Strictly address the grading rubric below.]
| Appendix: Rubric for Outcome 3.1 - Assessment of Ethical Reasoning | ||||
| Criteria | Does not meet expectations (1) | Meets expectations (2) | Exceeds Expectations (3) | Evaluation |
| Establishes facts | Poorly or vaguely establishes the relevant facts. | Identifies the many but not all of the facts pertinent to the ethical issue | Accurate establishes all facts that are or might be pertinent to establishment of the ethical issue and its resolution |
|
| Identifies Ethical Dilemma | Has at best a vague idea of what must be decided or recognition of the ethical issue. | Identifies and can describe the ethical dilemma in most respects, and can ascertains what must be decided. | Accurately describes the ethical dilemma in detail and has ascertained and articulated exactly what must be decided. |
|
| Considers stakeholders | Is unsure as to who should be involved in the decision-making process. | Determines who should be involved in the decision making process and accurately identifies all the stakeholders | Determines who should be involved in the decision making process and thoroughly reflects on the viewpoints of the stakeholders. |
|
| Analyzes Alternatives and Consequences | Begins to appraise the relevant facts and assumptions and identifies some alternatives | Clarifies at least two alternative and predicts their associated consequences in detail. | Clarified a number of alternatives and evaluates each on the basis of whether or not there is interest and concern over the welfare of all stakeholders. |
|
| Chooses an Action | Has difficulty identifying an appropriate course of action from among alternatives. | Formulates an implementation plan that delineates the execution of the decision. | Formulates an implementation plan that delineates the execution of the decision and that evidences a thoughtful reflection on the benefits and risks of action. |
|
| TOTAL |
| |||
| Source: Modified from rubric obtained from the University of Scranton | ||||
Q1. Write max one page (single space 300-500 words) of what action you would recommend to Renata and why …. (50 points)
Q2. Next score the six tests (1 to 7) below from Exhibit 4.6 to your recommendation in Q1. Write 5 to 9 lines to justify your score of each of the six tests. See an example on page 131. You need to write in six bullet points of 75 to 150 words for each test. (60 points with 10 points for each test) )
Publicity Test Score and reason
The Moral Mentor Test and reason
The Admired Observer Test and reason
The Transparency Test and reason
The Person in the Mirror Test
The Golden Rule Test
8
